Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 35

Author Topic: J’ACCUSE  (Read 14829 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Catholic Knight

J’ACCUSE
« on: June 28, 2024, 07:32:21 AM »
"Before my Brothers in the Episcopate and the entire ecclesial body, I accuse Jorge Mario Bergoglio of heresy and schism, and I ask that he be judged as a heretic and schismatic and removed from the Throne which he has unworthily occupied for over eleven years. This in no way contradicts the adage Prima Sedes a nemine judicatur, because it is evident that, since a heretic is unable to assume the Papacy, he is not above the Prelates who judge him."

https://exsurgedomine.it/240628-jaccuse-eng/
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: J’ACCUSE
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2024, 07:47:39 AM »
Quote
The Self-Removal of the Conciliar Hierarchy

Is it possible then that the Church has begun to teach error? Can we believe that the one Ark of salvation is at the same time also an instrument of perdition for souls? That the Mystical Body separates itself from its Divine Head, Jesus Christ, making the Savior’s promise fail? This cannot, of course, be admissible, and those who support such an idea fall into heresy and schism. The Church cannot teach error, nor can her Head, the Roman Pontiff, be at the same time heretical and orthodox, Peter and Judas, in communion with all his predecessors and at the same time in schism with them. The only theologically possible answer is that the Conciliar Hierarchy, which proclaims itself Catholic but embraces a faith different from that constantly taught for two thousand years by the Catholic Church, belongs to another entity and therefore does not represent the true Church of Christ.

He's literally one baby-step away (with this principle) from rejecting all the Antipopes from at least Montini on (and one might argue that he's doing that implicitly right here) ...

Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: J’ACCUSE
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2024, 07:50:01 AM »

Quote
IN DEFENSE OF THE CHURCH
My defense is therefore not a personal one, but rather a defense of the Holy Church of Christ, in which I have been constituted a Bishop and Successor of the Apostles, with the precise mandate of safeguarding the Deposit of Faith and preaching the Word, insisting opportune importune – in season and out of season – rebuking, reproving , exhorting with all patience and doctrine (2 Tim 4:2).
I strongly reject the accusation of having torn the seamless garment of the Savior and of having departed from being under the Supreme Authority of the Vicar of Christ: in order to separate myself from ecclesial communion with Jorge Mario Bergoglio, I would have to have first been in communion with him, which is not possible since Bergoglio himself cannot be considered a member of the Church, due to his multiple heresies and his manifest alienness and incompatibility with the role he invalidly and illicitly holds.

Logged

Online Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: J’ACCUSE
« Reply #3 on: June 28, 2024, 07:59:58 AM »
If we assume that +Vigano is sincere and not an infiltrator, then his conditional consecration provided him with the full effects of his office and we are witnessing the power of grace…
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: J’ACCUSE
« Reply #4 on: June 28, 2024, 08:07:22 AM »
Pay attention now, Stubborn, Meg, et al.  This is exactly what I've been writing here for years.
Quote
Is it possible then that the Church has begun to teach error? Can we believe that the one Ark of salvation is at the same time also an instrument of perdition for souls? That the Mystical Body separates itself from its Divine Head, Jesus Christ, making the Savior’s promise fail? This cannot, of course, be admissible, and those who support such an idea fall into heresy and schism.

+Vigano is spot on that the R&R types who promote the notion that the Church can teach error and become an instrument for the ruination of souls are guilty of heresy/schism.  I've stated that it's nothing more than thinly-veiled Old Catholicism.

Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 35
« previous next »