Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Vigano is St Athanasius, Martyr for the Faith, More Important Than 4th of July!  (Read 1380 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Texana

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 511
  • Reputation: +212/-58
  • Gender: Female
See the Livestream on the MHT Seminary website:  "Excommunicated"

https://www.youtube.com/@mhtseminary/streams

On YouTube, "Excommunicated"



Bishop Sanborn states that the SSPX must choose between Bergoglio and the Catholic Faith!

Offline AlNg

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 63
  • Reputation: +18/-9
  • Gender: Male

Bishop Sanborn states that the SSPX must choose between Bergoglio and the Catholic Faith!
I thought that SSPX already said that it would not support +Vigano. In their Masses, they say that they are una cuм (one with) Pope Francis?


Offline TKGS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5847
  • Reputation: +4694/-490
  • Gender: Male
It seems to me that Vigano is a Vatican 2 man, through and through.  He just thinks Bergoglio went too far.  

Maybe I'm wrong, but I've not read any reporting that suggests otherwise.

Offline Texana

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 511
  • Reputation: +212/-58
  • Gender: Female
It seems to me that Vigano is a Vatican 2 man, through and through.  He just thinks Bergoglio went too far. 

Maybe I'm wrong, but I've not read any reporting that suggests otherwise.
Dear TKGS,

Have you had a chance to read Bishop Vigano's "J'accuse"?  The PDF is on Cath Info from St. Andrew:

https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/vigano-i-accuse-jaccuse-(pdf)/

The primary source is always best.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 46860
  • Reputation: +27730/-5148
  • Gender: Male
It seems to me that Vigano is a Vatican 2 man, through and through.  He just thinks Bergoglio went too far. 

Maybe I'm wrong, but I've not read any reporting that suggests otherwise.

You have GOT to be kidding.  Where are you getting this stuff?  We've been following +Vigano for years, and he hasn't been a "Vatican 2 man" since June 9, 2020 when he reject V2 as intrinisically flawed and needing to be thrown into the dustbin (something even +Lefebvre never did).  Since then he has declared that Jorge is a non-Pope, repeatedly rejected V2 as not Catholic, denounced the V2/Conciliar Anti-Church, has come one baby-step away from declaring Roncalli-Ratzinger also to have been Anti-Popes (and in fact implicitly does so if you read his latest), has received conditional episcopal consecration from Bishop Williamson (despite having originally been "consecrated" by none other than St. John Paul II Wojtyla the Great), and has now been excommunicated by the V2 sect for schism, for having rejected Bergoglio and the "magisterial authority" of V2 (even +Lefebvre was not excommunicate for that).  He's gone far to the right of SSPX, and now to the right of the Resistance, and is basically in Sedeprivationist land.  "Vatican 2 man" ... have you been asleep at the switch these past 4 years?


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 46860
  • Reputation: +27730/-5148
  • Gender: Male
I thought that SSPX already said that it would not support +Vigano. In their Masses, they say that they are una cuм (one with) Pope Francis?

Yes, the SSPX have repudiated +Vigano, but +Sanborn says he doesn't think they'll ever side with +Vigano, and was more of less illustrating that they've shown their hand, i.e. who they really are by choosing Bergoglio over +Vigano.