Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6

Author Topic: Its official, Pope Paul VI canonization  (Read 4580 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Croix de Fer

Re: Its official, Pope Paul VI canonization
« Reply #20 on: March 23, 2018, 11:25:53 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on March 23, 2018, 11:19:09 AM
I personally think that PG should be banned for his comments; indeed they are vile.  I don't recall having seen Meg's in relation to St. Louis.

Meg must be a daughter of Asmodeus if she was making vile remarks about St. Louis de Montfort; and PG is totally undercarbed - lacking in sugar, thus his irrational stance towards the good saint.
Logged

Offline Croix de Fer

Re: Its official, Pope Paul VI canonization
« Reply #21 on: March 23, 2018, 11:27:51 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on March 23, 2018, 11:15:17 AM
No, canonization is part of the teaching authority (not merely a legal thing) ... which is why it is said to be infallible.
Which is why the privationist stance makes more sense, because Frank is not formally the Vicar of Christ, thus his "canonizing" people can only be valid, since the material act is there from a material "pope", if the person is truly a saint in the Eyes of God.


Quote
Plus, how would you sort out after the fact which were legit and which weren't?

If, or when, God removes the eclipse of the Church, and He restores the formal Vicar of Christ, he can rule which canonizations were legit and which weren't.

Btw, I didn't vote down your comment.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Its official, Pope Paul VI canonization
« Reply #22 on: March 23, 2018, 11:33:39 AM »
Quote from: Croix de Fer on March 23, 2018, 11:27:51 AM
Which is why the privationist stance makes more sense, because Frank is not formally the Vicar of Christ, thus his "canonizing" people can only be valid, since the material act is there from a material "pope", if the person is truly a saint in the Eyes of God.


If, or when, God removes the eclipse of the Church, and He restores the formal Vicar of Christ, he can rule which canonizations were legit and which weren't.

Btw, I didn't vote your comment down.

I would think that the new (legit) Pope would simply canonize the worthy candidates himself.

As for the downthumbs, I have acquired one or two stalkers who follow me around in CI and downthumb every post ... even if it's something entire non-controversial.  This post will get downthumbed by the same clown(s).
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Its official, Pope Paul VI canonization
« Reply #23 on: March 23, 2018, 11:35:28 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on March 23, 2018, 11:33:39 AM
I would think that the new (legit) Pope would simply canonize the worthy candidates himself.

As for the downthumbs, I have acquired one or two stalkers who follow me around in CI and downthumb every post ... even if it's something entire non-controversial.  This post will get downthumbed by the same clown(s).

LOL.  I kept refreshing the page.  It took less that one minute for the downthumb to show up.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Its official, Pope Paul VI canonization
« Reply #24 on: March 23, 2018, 11:39:38 AM »
Quote from: Ladislaus on March 23, 2018, 11:35:28 AM
LOL.  I kept refreshing the page.  It took less that one minute for the downthumb to show up.

I have a very good guess who one of them is, since I can see who's been active in the past 15 minutes.  There are a couple others in addition to her.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6
« previous next »