https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/its-official-paul-vi-and-oscar-romero-will-be-canonized-17384

And when this happens, the gates of hell will open...

Nah, most trads will just move the goal posts .... again.

Remember they don't believe canonizations are infallible.

Now, now.  They say that only the new ones aren't infallible ... because they don't do enough research on the candidates these days.

Since there is a long string of saints from Peter to, I think, the second or third century of when Our Lord established His Church, it's only fair for a parallel counterfeit church to canonize all it's new founders. 

Pope Paul VI - for whom would he be a patron saint? 

I went to that link and say an article entitled:  It's Official:  Pope John Paul I on his way to canonization and my first thought was "for what?  He was only Pope for 28 days or thereabouts."

I am going to make a prediction.  Within the next 20 years, Pope Benedict XVI and, if he passes soon, Pope Francis will also be canonized.

The Novus Ordo is canonizing all New Church Popes.

.
At Vat.II they pressed the reset button.
They started over.
Reboot.
The devil never creates something new.
He just copies the tried and true.
The first time around all the first Popes were recognized as saints.
It took hundreds of years before a Pope was not rewarded with sainthood.
Newchurch figures it'll be great to get hundreds of years out of this revolution.
Therefore, Newchurch is canonizing all Newchurch popes.
.

I believe I remember Meg saying recently that there's a saint she doesn't believe was a legitimate saint, and this was a saint from a LONG time ago. Wish I could remember but maybe she'll let us know. It has something to do with the Saint's opinion about FE or GC etc...

Yes, Meg and PG have been making vile accusations against St. Louis de Montfort.  e.g.
https://www.cathinfo.com/crisis-in-the-church/satanic-year-of-mercy-logo-of-pope-francis/msg599099/#msg599099
https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/fssp-granted-an-indult-to-offer-the-1958-holy-week-rubrics/msg598310/#msg598310
https://www.cathinfo.com/general-discussion/the-secret-hidden-within-marian-consecration/msg596555/#msg596555
That's pretty much a direct denial of the infallibility of pre-Vatican II canonizations.  PG in particular looks like a Protestant fifth columnist to me.

where does someone like me fit in... ?

I go to NO Mass but only because I have no choice and it IS (contrary to what here say) better than going to no Mass at all, sometimes it is very much so

But I don't believe that JP II is a saint. Has he been "canonized"? I've heard 2 different things

I don't belive John XXIII is either.. not hardly... not after instigating Vat II..

And whoever had the bright idea to abolish the Latin Mass? He is in league with the devil himself..

But still, there are some NO parishes that are good

where does someone like me fit in... ?

I go to NO Mass but only because I have no choice and it IS (contrary to what here say) better than going to no Mass at all, sometimes it is very much so...

No. It is not better than not going to mass at all. I have no choice, either, and when I did go to the NO, it was bad to worse to absolutely revolting. It's attending mass with zombies with their hippie priests and it shrivels my heart and mind to think, this is what has become of Christ's church.