Do not be surprised, and do not take it as mere "arguing" (in the pejorative sense), if some dispute the claims.  Such is actually to be expected.

Thank you for the information.

sounds like a lot of supposition and rumour mill........a "some one told something he said abou someone else about something"....

IF this forum were angelqueen, all the members of this thread would be banned for evening mentioning malachi martin. Servitums because enraged when like a psychopath when his name is brought up. Of course, serv also hates Fatima, so psychosis is to be expected from him.

IF this forum were angelqueen, all the members of this thread would be banned for evening mentioning malachi martin. Servitums because enraged when like a psychopath when his name is brought up. Of course, serv also hates Fatima, so psychosis is to be expected from him.

Why does he hate Fatima?

Has anyone on the board noticed how it is the women, parentsfortruth and Elizabeth, who defend Malachi Martin?  This gives me the creeps big-time since Martin was with almost absolute certainty a warlock.  This all reminds me of Eve and the serpent, of hucksters and charlatans like Rasputin and Cagliostro with mesmeric powers over the ladies.  

He also saw the notes for the book he had been working on before he died. He was going to 'tell all.' The book was going to be called, "Primacy: How the Institutionalized Roman Catholic Church became a Creature of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr."

You mean fifty years after the fact he was going to say what should have been obvious to everyone?  What a brave man.

Whenever someone has something that the enemies of the Church do not want people to know, they try to destroy that person, as they did with Cardinal Martin. They claimed he was a 'marrano' and an 'adulterer' and all kinds of slanderous venom against that person.

It's not "slander" to say he was a Marrano.  There are rumors he's a Jєω, he worked with the marrano Augustin Bea, and he was the periti who helped Bea enact the law at Vatican II that "absolved" Jєωs of their blood guilt.  Oh, and he never, ever publicly repented of this nor did he even admit he did it.  He actually said that they went too far for him at Vatican II but he was part of what he said they went too far on.  On top of this, he wrote a book under a pseudonym that positively reinforces and celebrates the new openness towards the Jєωs.  

Now you have been told.  Anyone who, knowing this, doesn't admit that he covered up his past has become a liar like he was.  What he did at Vatican II was a massive scandal that can only be corrected by public repentance.  Martin was the exact opposite of repentant, dressing in natty clothes, living some kind of jet-set life, hanging out with wealthy Jєωιѕн publishers.    

It wasn't until the 90's that Martin suggested Satanism in the Vatican by writing Windswept House, a book that manages to be trashy and sensationalistic yet mind-numbingly dull at the same time,  by showing a fictional black mass taking place in St. Paul's Cathedral.  If saying that there is Satanism in the Vatican means he was trying to expose the truth, then I guess we have to say the same for Paul VI, since he talked about the "smoke of Satan entering the Vatican."  Except Paul VI did this much, much earlier, so I guess he was actually more "prophetic" than Malachi Martin.

What Martin did was keep people in VII by admitting that something was wrong, that the upper hierarchy was corrupted, but he almost never discussed heresies, errors of the faith, or any of the real problems.  This is crucial to the plans of the devil because it keeps people in the mindset that the problem is that some of the clergy are occult heretics when the real problem is that they are public apostates.  Malachi Martin actually helped people to deny what they saw with their own eyes and to retreat into fantasies!  Like a true magician, he weaved a detailed, sensationalistic Hollywood version of events that literally gave people a false impression of reality.  Instead of "the Jєωs and Freemasons have their man on the Throne of Peter" he peddled a completely alternate reality that "The Pope is backed into a corner trying to do his best but is surrounded by colorful Satanists."  

It is exactly like Hollywood where films like The Exorcist, showing priests exorcizing demons, subliminally make people think the Church is still functioning normally.  No demon can cast out a demon, and no one involved with the Vatican II sect has any power over demons.  Of course, Malachi trafficked in that deception too, claiming to be an exorcist.  Someone who is possessed would probably become perfectly possessed after a visit from Malachi.  By the way, the best thing he ever did was come up with the term "perfect possession," which describes what he was.  

An "insider" like he claimed to be, parentsfortruth, would know right away that JPII was Satan's man in Amsterdam.  To know that something is wrong in the Vatican you do not need to hear about black Masses, you only have to read the docuмents of the VII Council.  But Martin covered up for the "Popes" his entire life.  He consistently and in a calculated manner posited that both Paul VI and JPII were somehow exempt from the skulduggery in the Vatican, perpetuating the "prisoner in the Vatican myth" that doesn't even work for Pius XII, let alone JPII.  

Of course, Martin was only a clean-up agent for the devil -- no one will be able to blame him on the Day of Judgment, since they are the ones who have remained willfully blind.  He just gave his audience what they already wanted, a little conspiracy-theory goulash to explain the obvious problems in the "Church," but not so much that their lives might be disrupted.  He was the perfect spiritual hitman for an age that has lost the faith, for minds turned into mush by Hollywood and with no concept of doctrine.  He gave people sensationalism and they ate it up because they cannot bear healthy truth.

As for me, I will be asking Cardinal Martin to recommend me to Our Lord, and I hope you might do the same.

Haven't you heard?  It's no honor to be called a Cardinal these days.  I would trust a cut-throat mobster before I'd trust one of these "Cardinals."

Raoul, with all due respect I have never heard Fr Martin say stay in the Vatican II church.  In the talk I own, "The deserted Vineyard", he tells people to attend the traditional Mass with properly ordained priests.  He encourages traditional devotions and so on.  He says the No Mass can be valid if said in Latin, with a properly ordained priest with the correct intention, but that almost all NO masses are invalid.  He puzzled over the actions of JPII, but he said he was not qualified to judge him.

Publicly blasting Fr Martin and saying he was a warlock and a Jєω is a mortal sin.  You are out of line.
 Yes, I am a man who is a big fan of Fr Martin.

Raoul, with all due respect I have never heard Fr Martin say stay in the Vatican II church.  In the talk I own, "The deserted Vineyard", he tells people to attend the traditional Mass with properly ordained priests.  He encourages traditional devotions and so on.  He says the No Mass can be valid if said in Latin, with a properly ordained priest with the correct intention, but that almost all NO masses are invalid.  He puzzled over the actions of JPII, but he said he was not qualified to judge him.

Publicly blasting Fr Martin and saying he was a warlock and a Jєω is a mortal sin.  You are out of line.
 Yes, I am a man who is a big fan of Fr Martin.

Actually he said that its okay for people to go to SSPV and CMRI Masses in an interview with I listened too.

He believed that the SVs were more Catholic than the Novus Ordo which would make him to the "right" of the SSPX.