The woman could also have a faulty testimony

Yeah, doubt it.  It wasn't as if she was giving minute detail, just the high level recollection that Bob supported her bid to become ordained.

Would like to hear Vigano's assessment.

Still nothing from Vigano.

Still nothing from Vigano.

Other than that Leo was not legitimately elected.

What else does he have to say?  Not sure why the SVs are so obsessed with Leo, since Leo's illegitimate and we could hardly care less about what he says any more than if it were the "Archbishop" of Canterbury.

I'm actually getting fed up with the Leo chatter ... and it's almost as if some SVs are even trying to convince themselves that he's not the Pope and to fight off the propaganda that he's some kind of traditionalist.  SVs appear to be following every word of Leo's and when they catch him saying something Modernist, they immediately pounce, with the attitude of:  "Aha.  See. Look.  I told you he was a Modernist."  Really?  Tell us something we don't now.

He's the false head of a false religion.  Period.  Until he renounces V2 and the NOM (which barring a miracle he'll never do), anything else he says or does is meaningless, and if that happens, please wake me up, but until then

Of course, this post is undoubtely yet another attack you're making in +Vigano, given your history ... since you could hardly care less about what +Vigano says.