Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Is There a Legitimate Way for Trads to get an Annulment?  (Read 25160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is There a Legitimate Way for Trads to get an Annulment?
« Reply #100 on: May 16, 2022, 09:22:17 PM »
Okay, looks like I'll have to post this again:

Does this answer your question? This is from a pre-Vatican 2 treatise on theology.

Oh, get off the high horse.  This isn't the only pre-Vatican II source, and some things were debated even before V2.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is There a Legitimate Way for Trads to get an Annulment?
« Reply #101 on: May 16, 2022, 09:23:24 PM »
Sodomy isn't merely a sin or a behavior, it's a perversion against nature that could be said to entail an essential error regarding the nature of the person being wedded.


Re: Is There a Legitimate Way for Trads to get an Annulment?
« Reply #102 on: May 16, 2022, 09:26:30 PM »
I just noticed that this is how Epiphany defines "traditional priest".  Since he's advocating for rome annulments, I assume he's not a sedevacantist, which leaves only the "indult" priests (if they are actually priests) as traditional (and they aren't traditional).


Just so everyone knows that ephiphany is an indult novus ordo type.  That's why he's arguing for the new code.
Wrong again, my friend.

Re: Is There a Legitimate Way for Trads to get an Annulment?
« Reply #103 on: May 16, 2022, 09:36:08 PM »
They would be subject to Vll canons
Correct.

Which is why I suggested talking to a traditional priest you trust.  And if you have pre-VII grounds for annulment, then you can apply for an annulment under post-VII grounds.  They may or may not be the same grounds.  God knows your intention.

If you do not have pre-VII grounds, stop and try to fix the marriage.

Re: Is There a Legitimate Way for Trads to get an Annulment?
« Reply #104 on: May 16, 2022, 09:50:26 PM »
I just noticed that this is how Epiphany defines "traditional priest".  Since he's advocating for rome annulments, I assume he's not a sedevacantist, which leaves only the "indult" priests (if they are actually priests) as traditional (and they aren't traditional).


Just so everyone knows that ephiphany is an indult novus ordo type.  That's why he's arguing for the new code.
"Advocating for rome"?  Are you saying that a sede priest has authority to nullify a marriage?