I didn't use "rash judgement" in my original post. I am more speaking of illegitimate criticisms, which boils down to false expectations. Again, it's illogical to argue that "I can't trust +Vigano because he isn't doing "x" and/or he's not calling out "y". Maybe your expectations are out of bounds with reality? Some are. That's my point.
Please excuse me, then. I must not be keeping up well IRT to the first sentence. A priori I don't have any expectations of Fr. Vigano because he is a highly public and well-funded figure, but that's before examining the evidence. We live in an era of universal deceit and massive propaganda. It's a reasonable assumption that anyone with media coverage is compromised to some degree and requires examination before trust.
I'm open to reading about +Vigano's opus dei connections. Such criticisms aren't mainstream, even for this site. First I've heard of it on here.
I will see what I can do if someone doesn't beat me to it. I have a long-term project of collating sources, but I am one man and it takes a lot of time. If I get that far it will be in a topic all its own.