CathInfo.com

I understand the legitimate reasons for a true annulment. I just wanted to know if the annulments post- Vll are valid-(.if they changed the process besides becoming extremely liberal?). As many of us don't accept Vll sacraments as being licit or even valid for reasons of ordination and change in rite, how can anyone go to Rome for an annulment?
In other words, even if for a legitimate cause, a traditional Catholic cannot get an annulment. Seems this is the case.

As I said, the Church holds itself out as being able to pass judgment upon the validity of any marriage.

Even if you got a diocesan tribunal who regarded you as being schismatic, unless they just wanted to spite you for being a traditionalist --- "oh, so you really want this annulment, coming hat in hand to us, are you?" --- ideally, it should just be a matter of saying "here's the putative marriage, let's evaluate it".

The way I heard it, hypothetically (though this would never happen in practice), two Jєωs or two Buddhists could walk into a tribunal, with previous marriages, and could say "can you make a judgment on whether we are free to contract what the Catholic Church would regard as a valid [natural, non-sacramental] marriage or not?".  Again, this would never happen, nobody would ever do that, but theoretically, they could.

Not true.  I knew a Protestant who requested and was granted an annulment.

Remember, the traditional and NO grounds may be different.  Talk to a traditional priest you trust and go from there.