The novus ordo, no matter what language is used, has a doubtfully valid consecration. Even if the consecration is valid, it is FURTHER doubtful that it is a complete mass, due to all the prayers in the offertory, canon, communion which were deleted and altered. Even if the consecration is valid, I believe it is not a mass, but just a communion service.
If you read what V2 theologians say about how they wanted to protestantize the mass, and change the meaning of 'sacrifice', it is logical to say that the purpose of the new mass is different than the TLM. If you question people who grew up with the novus ordo and do not have an orthodox understanding of the mass, they interpret (and are taught) that the 'sacrifice' of Christ is His offering of Himself in communion to us, instead of the TRUE sacrifice of the cross. The NEW understanding of the mass, is one that is centered on receiving Christ in Holy Communion, instead of the adoration and offering of Christ to God, in atonement for sin. V2 replaced Good Friday with Holy Thursday and most novus ordo catholics have no idea this even happened.
The novus ordo replaced the offering of God to God (God centered worship), with the offering of Christ to us (humanistic centered worship). It falsely teaches that Christ's Holy Communion offering to us is the purpose of His death on Good Friday. This is diabolically backwards!
Christ's death on the cross on Good Friday IS the mass. Holy Thursday and Holy Communion is an act of love, but it is NOT the sacrifice, nor is it the offering which appeases God for sin, or fulfills the 4 purposes of prayer. Holy Communion is a SACRAMENT, which is PART OF the mass, but it is not the mass. This is why the priest can say a private mass, with no communicants, because Holy Communion by the faithful is not required. It is also why anyone can attend as many masses in one day as possible, but can only receive communion once per day - because the mass is the re-enactment of the sacrifice of Calvary, not the re-enactment of Holy Thursday.