Author Topic: Is the CMRI schismatic? (Read 64302 times)

PerEvangelicaDicta · « **Reply #115 on:** December 04, 2014, 12:37:40 AM »

"I never attributed an evil intent."

? Then who typed all those comments?

"Objectively, the name advertizes a thing that shouldn't be advertized, and despite intention for the choice, has a bad effect."

This is dysfunctional obsession that has nothing to do with objectivity. Even when provided reason, you remain determined to persecute in vengeance. That's not coming from a heavenly source.

"Now, show me some popular traditional Catholic publication where "stubborn" is used frequently to signify some type of good character trait. When you find it, start another thread and I will be there."

He gave you examples of how and why he uses it, with holy intent. Put simply, he is stubborn for the Faith. I am stubborn for the Faith also. So are you.

You can respond if you choose, but I'm getting off here.

Stubborn · « **Reply #116 on:** December 04, 2014, 09:07:43 AM »

Quote from: Nado

Quote from: Stubborn
And I already refuted that reply because aside from it being crazy, all you replied with was the same attempt to reason that there can be justification for schism. Even Schuckardt would disagree since he allegedly got the schismatic bishop abjure his errors and make a profession of faith in his attempt to avoid your epikeia.

Like to try again?

That's actually better news I didn't even know about. He had his priorities straight then. He attempted conversion first, and then took a Catholic Sacrament that didn't even belong to that sect.

"all you replied with was the same attempt to reason that there can be justification for schism"

This statement of yours is what is called the logical fallacy of begging the question. Go read about it, because it is invalid reasoning.

Like to try again or not?

Stubborn · « **Reply #117 on:** December 04, 2014, 09:09:50 AM »

Quote from: Nado

Quote from: PerEvangelicaDicta
"I never attributed an evil intent."

? Then who typed all those comments?

"Objectively, the name advertizes a thing that shouldn't be advertized, and despite intention for the choice, has a bad effect."

This is dysfunctional obsession that has nothing to do with objectivity. Even when provided reason, you remain determined to persecute in vengeance. That's not coming from a heavenly source.

"Now, show me some popular traditional Catholic publication where "stubborn" is used frequently to signify some type of good character trait. When you find it, start another thread and I will be there."

He gave you examples of how and why he uses it, with holy intent. Put simply, he is stubborn for the Faith. I am stubborn for the Faith also. So are you.

You can respond if you choose, but I'm getting off here.

Here is what "Stubborn" posted on fisheaters over 4 years ago:

"As for me, I was raised by stubborn parents who persevered in the faith throughout the revolution. I learned if one was not stubborn for the faith, then one has no chance to persevere to the end - so, I'm trying to be what my folks taught me to be, so I'm Stubborn - for the faith. :) "

He learned wrongly. Even Protestants can have a good intention of following what their parents wrongly taught them.

The Catholic books teach no such thing.

Using your CMRI wonderful Christian charity, why don't you start a new thread about it if it obsesses you so much?

Stubborn · « **Reply #118 on:** December 04, 2014, 11:49:09 AM »

Must be the same books that teach you schism is good and lawful.

Stubborn · « **Reply #119 on:** December 04, 2014, 12:17:07 PM »

Quote from: Nado

Quote from: Stubborn
Must be the same books that teach you schism is good and lawful.

No thanks for that falsehood, but if you can show where your parents learned what they supposedly learned, I will look at it.

If you had an ounce of faith, you'd have the understanding of what it means, but you don't so you won't.

Just keep doing what you're doing, justify schism however you like - certainly sincere people of good will can use your posts to know what not to do.