Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6

Author Topic: Is Strickland waking up?  (Read 9819 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Johannes

Is Strickland waking up?
« on: November 13, 2024, 06:00:47 PM »
Strickland seems like a genuine guy. I hope he fully wakes up to the Vatican II heresies and denounces the false church at its root like Vigano did. In this scathing rebuke, he literally calls all the bishops heretics, and Francis an apostate (though I don't think he fully realizes that is what he is doing). He still thinks of them as Catholics who can retain their offices.

Bishop Strickland: God will punish bishops for their silence while Pope Francis destroys the Church - LifeSite

It could have been written by Fr. Hewko. 

I would bet $20 that Fr. Hewko gives a h0mily about it within the week!  

i.e. (in his booming voice)
"Strickland is waking up! He is right! But he needs to reject Vatican II, that the new mass gives grace, the new mass miracles are real, etc..." 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/bishop-strickland-god-will-punish-bishops-for-their-silence-while-pope-francis-destroys-the-church/?utm_source=featured-news&utm_campaign=usa

He could do a lot for Tradition if he just gets that final push of grace. Please pray and fast for his conversion.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is Strickland waking up?
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2024, 06:17:26 PM »
Yeah, he's basically accused Bergoglio of having deviated from the Faith.  I made an X post encouraging him to contact Archbishop Vigano to take the next steps.

Yes, we know where he needs to go eventually, but we need to have some patience, as with +Vigano, who took it one step at a time.  He may or may not make it to where he needs to be, but he's moving in the right direction, and it's wrong to criticize him because he hasn't fully woken up yet.  Few of us did not go on some journey to get to where we're at.

At the same time, he keeps posting various Encyclicals from Wojtyla on X, and I keep responding by pointiing out how Wojtyla the Great was the biggest religious indifferentist to ever sit on the See of Peter and that his activities make the Pachamama look like childsplay and that the all religions lead to God was pioneered by Wojtyla the Great, not Bergoglio.  Hopefully he sees it and start to realize that Bergoglio isn't an "outlier" but that his predecessors were just as bad and that the entire Conciliar religion is not Catholic.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is Strickland waking up?
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2024, 07:22:42 PM »
Quote from: Johannes on November 13, 2024, 07:00:16 PM
100%


Though I would be remiss to not acknowledge my fear for him is that he will end up creating some kind of pseudo-traditional novus ordo schism of the schism cult - like the "underground" Chinese "church". So, hopefully he does put those missing pieces together sooner rather than later. Prayers and sacrifices!

Yes, I saw that Novus Ordo Watch took a shot at Bishop Strickland, since he hadn't gone far enough, for which I rebuked them.  As you put it, they need to pray for him rather than criticize him ... as if that's going to draw him in their direction somehow.

So, I'm hoping that Bishop Strickland now reaches out to +Vigano to take the next steps.  Sometimes it just takes that one extra factor to give something the needed momentum, where if you now have 2 NO bishops defecting from the Conciliar Church and denouncing Bergoglio, you may then add another (perhaps Cardinal Zen, who also recently attached Jorge), and then another ... and at some point it hits a critical mass where it starts moving, like a snowball that starts rolling downhill when that one extra snowflake puts it over the top.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Is Strickland waking up?
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2024, 07:08:51 AM »
Quote from: Johannes on November 14, 2024, 04:38:32 PM
BREAKING: Bishop Strickland Rebukes Pope and US Bishops (@38:00 mm)

I struggled a bit with Lofton, because he is so personally distasteful to me as a person. But then it finally dawned on me that he actually understands the situation 100% and has chosen to plant his feet firmly in the Modernist camp. It really only comes down to 2 positions, you are either with the man claiming to be pope - who 99% of the worlds self-professed Catholics also acknowledge to be so - no matter what Satanic filth pours out of his mouth or evil acts he commits or endorses, or you will come by degrees (some quicker than others, no two people are exactly the same and everyone has different gifts/resources) to see that he is not really a true pope. Even though I think someone with Lofton's "schooling" is most likely bad-willed, I think his take on what happens next with Strickland is spot on.

Oh, Lofton is absolutely horrible, constantly popesplaining away.  He regularly contradicts himself, at first, for example, having denounced the blessing of sodomite couples, touting the fact that Bergoglio didn't approve of it ... until Bergoglio approved of it and then suddenly he was for blessing sodomites.  He's just a total scuŠ¼bag grifter.  I'd have more respect for a flaming-at-the-mouth Modernist who's at least sincere in his beliefs rather than this unprincipled turd.

I have no idea why anyone takes that loser seriously or spends 30 seconds watching his show.
Logged

Offline Meg

Re: Is Strickland waking up?
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2024, 10:22:52 AM »
Quote from: Johannes on November 15, 2024, 09:34:36 AM
Agreed. Though his prediction about Vigano turned out true, and similarly what he said in the above clip from the 38:00 mm to the 38:08 mm (8 seconds), I think will equally prove true. I never listened to him for his commentary (which is beyond terrible), but he started dropping into my feed when his channel first started because I was watching a lot of SSPX stuff. At that time, I was still defending the ecclesiology of the SSPX, so he angered me as I saw his criticisms as unjust. But like I said above, after studying the SV position long and hard I had a moment of revelation that He actually does understand that R&R is a dead-end and principally not Catholic. The only logical choice is to either be for the Conciliar Church and its popes or completely against it (no middle ground), therefore I was able to see that he is most likely a bad-willed actor trying to keep sheep in the wolves' den rather than the conservative Novus Ordo that he pretends to be. So, from time-to-time I still give him a quick listen to get a feel on how his camp is thinking. I was especially grateful to see the Dimond's put him in his place as an, "useful idiot of Satan" and even 80-lbs-soaking-wet-90-year-old Zen jump on his back calling him out as a, "large man with a tiny beard". Sometimes we can learn from our enemies too. Lofton needs prayers for his conversion.

Sacred Heart of Jesus have mercy on us and our erring brethren - 300 days.



I can understand why you think that R&R is not Catholic, but then neither is sedevacantism, IMO. They are both reactions to the fact of Modernists having taken over and are occupying the Church. Both are a means for trying to make sense of a terrible situation - an abnormal situation - so we can't expect that there will be a solidly Catholic response, since the Church has not directly ever addressed about how to deal with this type of situation. 

I don't see how anyone can stand Lofton. He's extreme in his views. And not in a good way.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
« previous next »