And yet he never explicitly states that you can not do so. I think taking this on its own is much like taking one Bible verse on its own. One must look to all that the Church has said on this topic. When one does, it is understandable why a SV can come to the conclusion he has come to.
I'm still thinking that you are coming off as saying your way is the only way.
I also can understand why some think that R&R is really just dethroning a pope without stating it.
I am saying what the Bull clearly states. My way or not, the Bull says what the Bull says much as I wish it said it was our duty to proclaim there is no pope - but it doesn't and, I think the reasons for this are as I already stated in my previous post.
The way that Bull is worded, and I am sure many SVs will be the first to say - the Bull is infallible, as such, we cannot make exceptions to what it says or we change it's meaning, which is how heresies are started - which is why we must read it as it is written.