Here's the original Italian of a controversial passage:
"E io credo in Dio. Non in un Dio cattolico, non esiste un Dio cattolico, esiste Dio. E credo in Gesù Cristo, sua incarnαzιone. Gesù è il mio maestro e il mio pastore, ma Dio, il Padre, Abbà, è la luce e il Creatore."

Here's my translation (with improved punctuation):
"And I believe in God. Not in a catholic God; a catholic God does not exist; God exists. And I believe in Jesus Christ, his incarnation. Jesus is my master/teacher and pastor, but God, the Father, Abba, is the light and the Creator."

It's strange he uses a disjunction between God and Jesus. He also says Jesus Christ is God's incarnation. God becomes man? The Second Person of the Holy Trinity took on human flesh; the Incarnation was not a substantial change of God into a human. So, he seems to promote Arianism. He equates the Father with the Holy Trinity, and the Son with a man.

To make the Arianism more apparent, replace "God" with "Holy Trinity":
"And I believe in God[the Holy Trinity]. Not in a catholic God[Holy Trinity]; a catholic God[Holy Trinity] does not exist; God[the Holy Trinity] exists. And I believe in Jesus Christ, his[the Holy Trinity's] incarnation. Jesus is my master/teacher and pastor, but God[the Holy Trinity], the Father, Abba, is the light and the Creator."

Can anyone please prove me wrong?

Can anyone please prove me wrong?

Geremia,

I can't prove you wrong, his statement is clear and heretical.  What are his apologists saying in his defense?

Even the modernist Vatican has had difficulty with damage control.

This is what I call the Vatican's "Francis Problem." It was evident early with his comments during his daily NOM. His remarks were so outrageous that it was soon decided by his handlers (and I do mean "handlers") that what he said would no longer be published. He's not just off the cuff; he's off the reservation. The more he talks, the closer he comes to giving away the game. As they say, "The jig is [almost] up."