1) The Sedes would rally around that true Pope because he will have confirmed what they already believe.

2) The Sedes would submit themselves to the true Pope's judgment in the matter because they know that a true Pope is guided by Jesus Christ. Again, you said this man would be a "true Pope." Let's say there was a miraculous sign that confirmed his status as such. If a Sede did not submit to him, they would betray their own principles.

Again, Sedevacantism is nothing more than an opinion that tries to make sense of the Crisis. It is not a dogma. But it is not formally inconsistent with Catholic dogma. The version of R&R that claims that the true Popes can be "heretics" while continuing to be true Popes is formally inconsistent with Catholic dogma.

So we agree that a future "true Pope" would have to condemn V2?

OK, I think I understand you.

You are saying:

No matter what, whoever the Cardinals say is Pope is Pope.

Exsurge Domine
In virtue of our pastoral office committed to us by the divine favor we can under no circuмstances tolerate or overlook any longer the pernicious poison of the above errors without disgrace to the Christian religion and injury to orthodox faith. Some of these errors we have decided to include in the present docuмent; their substance is as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
and so on.

Here are the options we are discussing:

Sede Lapsa (dogmatic R&R) = the See is legitimately occupied AND the true Pope is a heretic = Old Catholic Heresy

Sede Vacante = the See is illegitimately occupied AND the usurper is a heretic = Roman Catholic

Sede Impedita = the See is legitimately occupied BUT the true Pope is prevented from acting = Roman Catholic


This is a good article that explains the Roman Catholic Options:

https://novusordowatch.org/2024/11/when-shepherd-is-struck-sedevacantist-disunity/

"As we have seen, such possible contingencies include sede impedita as well as an extended period of sede vacante. They manifestly do not include what we might call sede lapsa, the idea that heresy and error can come from the Chair of Truth. (This idea of a “Holy See gone bad” is held by a great many “traditional Catholics” today who have chosen to acknowledge the Vatican II popes as true Popes yet resisting any exercise of these claimants’ office judged to be contrary to pre-Vatican II teaching or practice.)"

It is not used in Canon Law because it is not Catholic. It is a descriptive term for the heretical position staked out by the Dogmatic R&R adherents.

Where did you come up with this nonsense? It does not mean that at all, never has.

Sede Vacante = The Latin term that is used for when the Pope dies or resigns and a successor hasn't yet been elected, the phrase means "the seat is vacant."

It does not mean because the pope is a heretic we have no pope, it does not mean that everyone should slander the man who is actually occupies the seat, nor does it encourage anyone to condemn as heretics all those who disagree.... it's a phrase that has been maliciously usurped by sedes to mean all of this, but only to some sedes.

Council of Trent:
SESSION THE FOURTH

Celebrated on the eighth day of the month of April, in the year MDXLVI.

DECREE CONCERNING THE CANONICAL SCRIPTURES

The sacred and holy, ecuмenical, and general Synod of Trent,--lawfully assembled in
the Holy Ghost, the Same three legates of the Apostolic Sec presiding therein,--
keeping this [Page 18] always in view, that, errors being removed, the purity itself of
the Gospel be preserved in the Church; which (Gospel), before promised through the
prophets in the holy Scriptures, our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, first
promulgated with His own mouth, and then commanded to be preached by His
Apostles to every creature, as the fountain of all, both saving truth, and moral
discipline; and seeing clearly that this truth and discipline are contained in the written
books, and the unwritten traditions which, received by the Apostles from the mouth of
Christ himself, or from the Apostles themselves, the Holy Ghost dictating, have come
down even unto us, transmitted as it were from hand to hand; (the Synod) following
the examples of the orthodox Fathers, receives and venerates with an equal affection
of piety, and reverence, all the books both of the Old and of the New Testament--
seeing that one God is the author of both --as also the said traditions, as well those
appertaining to faith as to morals, as having been dictated, either by Christ's own word
of mouth, or by the Holy Ghost, and preserved in the Catholic Church by a continuous
succession. And it has thought it meet that a list of the sacred books be inserted in this
decree, lest a doubt may arise in any one's mind, which are the books that are received
by this Synod. They are as set down here below: of the Old Testament: the five books
of Moses, to wit, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy; Josue, Judges,
Ruth, four books of Kings, two of Paralipomenon, the first book of Esdras, and the
second which is entitled Nehemias; Tobias, Judith, Esther, Job, the Davidical Psalter,
consisting of a hundred and fifty psalms; the Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, the Canticle of
Canticles, Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Isaias, Jeremias, with Baruch; Ezechiel, Daniel;
the twelve minor prophets, to wit, Osee, Joel, Amos, Abdias, Jonas, Micheas, Nahum,
Habacuc, Sophonias, Aggaeus, Zacharias, Malachias; two books of the Machabees,
the first and the second. Of the New Testament: the four Gospels, according [Page 19]
to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John; the Acts of the Apostles written by Luke the
Evangelist; fourteen epistles of Paul the apostle, (one) to the Romans, two to the
Corinthians, (one) to the Galatians, to the Ephesians, to the Philippians, to the
Colossians, two to the Thessalonians, two to Timothy, (one) to Titus, to Philemon, to
the Hebrews; two of Peter the apostle, three of John the apostle, one of the apostle
James, one of Jude the apostle, and the Apocalypse of John the apostle. But if any one
receive not, as sacred and canonical, the said books entire with all their parts, as they
have been used to be read in the Catholic Church, and as they are contained in the old
Latin vulgate edition; and knowingly and deliberately contemn the traditions
aforesaid; let him be anathema. Let all, therefore, understand, in what order, and in
what manner, the said Synod, after having laid the foundation of the Confession of
faith, will proceed, and what testimonies and authorities it will mainly use in
confirming dogmas, and in restoring morals in the Church.