Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22

Author Topic: Is a CMRI chapel a reasonable substitute for a Resistance Mass?  (Read 14035 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Is a CMRI chapel a reasonable substitute for a Resistance Mass?
« Reply #100 on: August 07, 2018, 11:48:59 AM »
Quote
Well, maybe Bishop Williamson doesn't consider Feeneyism to be heretical as you do.
And maybe this chapel doesn't make "feeneyism" as big deal and most "3 baptism" chapels do?  I've been to this chapel before; there was no "Baptism litmus test" for admittance.  The priest holds his views on baptism and doesn't require anyone else to believe anything.

Most people who believe in "3 baptisms" act as if it's a dogma.  Most who are "feeneyites" think there's room for discussion.  The "3 baptisms" group is far more rabid and obsessed...so they assume the feeneyites are just as obsessed (which they aren't).
Logged

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Is a CMRI chapel a reasonable substitute for a Resistance Mass?
« Reply #101 on: August 07, 2018, 01:01:26 PM »
Another "black n white", "either-or", "binary" mindset from a sedevacantist.  You lack the ability to admit, or recognize, distinctions.
Logged

Offline MyrnaM

Re: Is a CMRI chapel a reasonable substitute for a Resistance Mass?
« Reply #102 on: August 07, 2018, 02:59:47 PM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on August 07, 2018, 01:01:26 PM
Another "black n white", "either-or", "binary" mindset from a sedevacantist.  You lack the ability to admit, or recognize, distinctions.
By distinctions do you mean the quality of your pope?
Logged

Offline monka966

Re: Is a CMRI chapel a reasonable substitute for a Resistance Mass?
« Reply #103 on: August 07, 2018, 05:18:19 PM »
Just cut the crap and find yourself a SSPV/CSPV chapel.
Logged

Offline JPaul

Re: Is a CMRI chapel a reasonable substitute for a Resistance Mass?
« Reply #104 on: August 07, 2018, 06:10:34 PM »
Quote from: Centroamerica on August 07, 2018, 12:16:02 PM
You either deny the Council of Trent or you don’t. Pretty cut and dry. If you think that Baptism or the desire thereof is a debatable topic then you believe the canons of the Council of Trent are a debatable topic. And yes, that makes you a heretic. Clear cut and easy to see.
An orthodox reading of the Council of Trent does not support baptism of desire as understood by modern clerics and laity.
There were not many liberals in those days.
You would have us believe that the Church needed the council of Trent to clarify the dogma of exclusive salvation. It is an absurd notion.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22
« previous next »