Fr. Feeney ran afoul of Cardinal Cushing because Cushing felt that Feeney was attacking his sister and brother in law and because young Bobby Kennedy complained about him. Cushinf was unjust.
But Fr did wrong by not obeying his superior and going to his new assignment. He was wrong in setting up that cultish living arrangement with his followers. He was wrong to break up married couples. He was wrong to forbid the children of his followers to be raised by their parents. He was wrong in attacking Maisie Ward his former friend and publisher. He was wrong in making fun of Mother Cabrini.
I assume you're a Lefebvrite, correct? Is it also true that you're disobedient to what you perceive to be an Ecuмenical Council promulgated with Paul VI's so-called apostolic authority and over 60 years of encylicals, laws, disciplines, apostolic exhortations, etc., etc. from what you perceive to be the Catholic hierarchy?
If that is true, how can you consistently reproach Fr. Feeney for disobeying a vile heretic, B'nai B'rith man of the year, who called the salvation dogma nonsense and pioneered ecuмenical meetings while at the same time being okay with rejecting an ecuмenical council?
I don't know about those other things you mentioned, I doubt Feeney was doing anything obviously evil. In any case, the reason he was persecuted was because he preached no salvation outside the Church without compromise while the apostate hierarchs were getting ready to prove their faithlessness at Vatican II, completely vindicating Fr. Feeney who was pretty much the only one screaming that something is terribly wrong.
I invite everyone who has a negative impression of Feeney to listen (5 min) to his letter to Pius XII and reconsider:
Topic: Interesting comment on Fr. Leonard Feeney by his Jesuit superior (Read 8530 times)