I don't think traditionalists should be too strongly defending anyone in today's hierarchy.  This is a nightmare for the reputation of Catholic Church, to have such wicked masonic priests in such high places.

You still think it's the Catholic Church, Tele?

I have been meaning to write about this for a long time, but I grew up next to the infamous preschool McMartin, the school that was famous for being the center of the most costly trial in American history.  My mom was about to enroll me there but backed out at the last minute, thanks be to God.  Hundreds of children claimed to be molested there, that there were tunnels underneath where they were smuggled to partake in strange rituals, allegedly where local neighborhood figures, movie stars and high-powered types all participated.  The owners of the school were acquitted but many questions remain:  there are so many shady people involved with the case, the court system is Masonic, and witnesses were turning up dead before going to trial, see what I'm saying?  

People should read about it.  I think it is another potential 9/11, and that maybe the reason that no conviction could be secured is that too many wealthy and powerful figures were involved who knew how to cover their tracks, who had the law in their pockets.  There are too many questions -- what is with the people turning up dead before they testified?  Why did the Jєωιѕн D.A. Ira Reiner not admit the evidence of kids with STDs?  How about the fact that the most well-known book about the McMartin case was written by a couple who published a sex-kink journal in the 1970's that had pedophilia material?  And so on.  

However, I do not say for sure that anything really happened at McMartin, because it is also possible that the devil possessed certain people to start a kind of hysteria that MIRRORED what was happening elsewhere, but not here.  Because after McMartin was over, everything was blamed on a witch-hunt, on implanted memories in the kids, and everyone began to breathe easy that there were no child-sex cults.  But then later, real child-sex cults were proven to exist, if not on the scale that McMartin was said to be.

Whatever the case, knowing how the devil likes to hound me, I am positive that he is involved in McMartin in some capacity.  cօռspιʀαcιҽs seem to have been a part of my life since the beginning.  My first step to becoming Catholic was when I heard about what is called the "Franklin Cover-Up."  I was so disgusted that the first thing I thought was, "This is what happens when people deny God, this is how low they can sink."  That was the beginning of my conversion.  And then, of course, I knew about the "Church" and its problems and even at CMRI there is the spectre of Shuckardt, who, if not a child molester, allegedly liked young men.

I believe that if you knew what was really going on with these Masonic "priests" and "bishops" you would never stop puking.  The VII "Church" is a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ ring, beyond a shadow of a doubt, and it  wouldn't surprise me if there was a child-murdering and child-prostitution ring there as well.  It seems to go hand-in-hand.  That is why I am not surprised at all by the loathsome news in the article and I bet you it's only the tip of the iceberg.  It will be a sad, yet at the same time a great day if the truth does come out.  That will make it easier for people to realize this really was not the Bride of Christ, although in itself not even the most depraved human actions can prove that.  It is the Magisterium, or more specifically, their false Magisterium, that is the proof.

Our society chapel had a "catechism class" that was intended it seems to tell us to defend the reputation of the conciliar priesthood, without much emphasis on linking the current scandals to the crisis in the Church.  A letter to the editor by a Jєωιѕн businessman was supposed to be the basis of a defense of the Church.

It is folly for traditionalists to defend the conciliar priesthood of the past 50 years.