Author Topic: Imposter Sr Lucy (Read 2148 times)

roscoe · « **on:** May 05, 2013, 03:42:54 PM »

Most know more about this than i do. That being the case could someone pls relate exactly when the imposter is suppose to have appeared. Was the real Sr Lucy murdered? :detective:

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #1 on:** May 05, 2013, 04:23:46 PM »

The imposter "Sister Lucia" appeared some time in the late 50s or early to mid 60s, I think.

I don't know what happened to the real Sister Lucia.

Incredulous · « **Reply #2 on:** May 05, 2013, 04:37:52 PM »

There seem to only be rumors of her demise.

Bro. Michael Dimond (?) claims to have received a letter from a lady who's parents were high level freemasons in Europe. As a child, she said to have heard her parents claim to have been involved in "Sister Lucy's" murder in the late 1950s.

Here's a link with photo on the Two Sister Lucys:
TIA 2-Lucys

bowler · « **Reply #3 on:** May 05, 2013, 04:46:02 PM »

The pictures and her super outgoing behavior with JPII indicate to me that TIA is spot on. If indeed it is accurate, it shows just how aware the Conciliarists are of the importance of the message and the consecration. They lost the faith and their minds. They will ALL have to face God one day. The deepest worst pit of hell is reserved for bad priests.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #4 on:** May 05, 2013, 04:56:39 PM »

Quote from: Incredulous

There seem to only be rumors of her demise.

Bro. Michael Dimond (?) claims to have received a letter from a lady who's parents were high level freemasons in Europe. As a child, she said to have heard her parents claim to have been involved in "Sister Lucy's" murder in the late 1950s.

Here's a link with photo on the Two Sister Lucys:
TIA 2-Lucys

Bro. Michael Dimond should publish that letter online.
If true, would implicate the conciliarists all the way up to John XXIII.
The mason could not have done it without collaborators high up in
the church of 1959-1960.

s2srea · « **Reply #5 on:** May 05, 2013, 04:59:46 PM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953

Quote from: Incredulous
There seem to only be rumors of her demise.

Bro. Michael Dimond (?) claims to have received a letter from a lady who's parents were high level freemasons in Europe. As a child, she said to have heard her parents claim to have been involved in "Sister Lucy's" murder in the late 1950s.

Here's a link with photo on the Two Sister Lucys:
TIA 2-Lucys

Bro. Michael Dimond should publish that letter online.
If true, would implicate the conciliarists all the way up to John XXIII.
The mason could not have done it without collaborators high up in
the church of 1959-1960.

The 2 Sr. Lucy story is true, but the Dimonds are liars.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #6 on:** May 05, 2013, 05:11:35 PM »

Quote from: s2srea

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953
Quote from: Incredulous
There seem to only be rumors of her demise.

Bro. Michael Dimond (?) claims to have received a letter from a lady who's parents were high level freemasons in Europe. As a child, she said to have heard her parents claim to have been involved in "Sister Lucy's" murder in the late 1950s.

Here's a link with photo on the Two Sister Lucys:
TIA 2-Lucys

Bro. Michael Dimond should publish that letter online.
If true, would implicate the conciliarists all the way up to John XXIII.
The mason could not have done it without collaborators high up in
the church of 1959-1960.

The 2 Sr. Lucy story is true, but the Dimonds are liars.

The Dimond Brothers put out some good material. I especially like
their video on the four last things.

If we just have a Church that would teach 100% Catholic Truth, there would
be no use for them. They would close up shop fast.

bowler · « **Reply #7 on:** May 05, 2013, 05:21:57 PM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953

Quote from: Incredulous
There seem to only be rumors of her demise.

Bro. Michael Dimond (?) claims to have received a letter from a lady who's parents were high level freemasons in Europe. As a child, she said to have heard her parents claim to have been involved in "Sister Lucy's" murder in the late 1950s.

Here's a link with photo on the Two Sister Lucys:
TIA 2-Lucys

Bro. Michael Dimond should publish that letter online.
If true, would implicate the conciliarists all the way up to John XXIII.
The mason could not have done it without collaborators high up in
the church of 1959-1960.

The last I heard, the Dimond's taught that Pius XII consecrated Russia, and that we had the period of peace right after when Stalin died. I don't agree of course, but that is what they are teaching.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #8 on:** May 05, 2013, 05:28:21 PM »

Quote from: bowler

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953
Quote from: Incredulous
There seem to only be rumors of her demise.

Bro. Michael Dimond (?) claims to have received a letter from a lady who's parents were high level freemasons in Europe. As a child, she said to have heard her parents claim to have been involved in "Sister Lucy's" murder in the late 1950s.

Here's a link with photo on the Two Sister Lucys:
TIA 2-Lucys

Bro. Michael Dimond should publish that letter online.
If true, would implicate the conciliarists all the way up to John XXIII.
The mason could not have done it without collaborators high up in
the church of 1959-1960.

The last I heard, the Dimond's taught that Pius XII consecrated Russia, and that we had the period of peace right after when Stalin died. I don't agree of course, but that is what they are teaching.

Pius XII consecrated the World and there was no mentioned of Russia.
I agree, The Dimond's got it wrong there.

roscoe · « **Reply #9 on:** May 05, 2013, 05:53:53 PM »

In case anyone hasn't heard, Russia is part of the world & as such would be included in the consecration by Pope Pius XII. I do not however consider the period following Uncle Joes demise to constitute the promised period of peace.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #10 on:** May 05, 2013, 06:15:43 PM »

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953

The Dimond Brothers put out some good material. I especially like
their video on the four last things.

Yes, but they are still extremists.

Quote from: bowler

The last I heard, the Dimond's taught that Pius XII consecrated Russia, and that we had the period of peace right after when Stalin died. I don't agree of course, but that is what they are teaching.

Many sedevacantists, I think, believe the Consecration was done by Pope Pius XII because they think John XXIII through Francis I are antipopes, and so they can't validly Consecrate Russia.

If Pius XII did it correctly, however, then Our Lady lied when she said that Russia would convert, because so far it hasn't converted.

Matto · « **Reply #11 on:** May 05, 2013, 06:25:51 PM »

Quote from: Incredulous

Here's a link with photo on the Two Sister Lucys:
TIA 2-Lucys

When I look at the pictures, it does look to me like they are two different people.

TKGS · « **Reply #12 on:** May 05, 2013, 08:13:24 PM »

Quote from: roscoe

In case anyone hasn't heard, Russia is part of the world & as such would be included in the consecration by Pope Pius XII. I do not however consider the period following Uncle Joes demise to constitute the promised period of peace.

Oh, and of course, "many" is part of "all" so the change of the form of the Holy Eucharist at Mass would be perfectly acceptable too.

roscoe, refusing to explicitly name "Russia", and instead naming the whole world thinking that this will suffice for God, is a demonstration of a lack of faith in God. The only reason to refuse to name this country was fear of offending them while there was no fear of offending God in this manner.

Neil Obstat · « **Reply #13 on:** May 07, 2013, 03:36:51 AM »

Quote from: ServusSpiritusSancti

Quote from: RomanCatholic1953
The Dimond Brothers put out some good material. I especially like
their video on the four last things.

Yes, but they are still extremists.

Jesus Christ was an extremist. And so was His mother, the Blessed Virgin Mary.

St. John the Baptist was about as extreme of an extremist as you can get.

All the 12 Apostles were extremists. Also, St. Paul -- talk about extremist!

St. Pius X was an extremist. So was Pope St. Pius V.

St. John Vianney was an extremist, and so too St. John Bosco and St. Alphonsus
de Liguori. St. Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort was an extremist. And St.
Maximilian Kolbe was likewise: an extremist!

In fact, every saint in the history of the Church was an extremist.

So, what's wrong with being an extremist?

Maizar · « **Reply #14 on:** May 07, 2013, 03:47:39 AM »

Quote from: Neil Obstat

So, what's wrong with being an extremist?

Nothing, using your definition, but they weren't extremists at all.

Extremism is a mental illness, a form of madness. Read Chesterton on this.

The Lord, Our Lady and the Saints were all perfectly sane, however they were radicals, being that they have taken doctrine and applied it completely and fully in their lives. Radicalism is usually wrong because the doctrine is wrong, but when it pertains to Catholicism, nothing could be more right.