Then you accept the FACT that Br. Michael of the Holy Trinity was in total error about the messages of Lucia, since her interview with Evaristo totally contradicts Br. Michael of the Holy Trinity's books.
Tradhican-
I have no idea who Evaristo is. Why should I care what he says (what are his qualifications, and what evidence does he have to back his claims)?
I respect Br. Michael’s work by reputation alone (ie., as a member of the Abbe de Nantes’ community, he would not be predisposed to regurgitate the Vatican party line), and I see it praised by both conciliarists and anti conciliarists.
I note that Br. Michael’s work is frequently recommended by Bishop Williamson (one who likewise would be suspicious of the Vatican party line on Fatima).
Ultimately, I want a good explanation of why this thesis was not made for 60 years.