Who said kidnapping? Don't know what happened to Sr Lucy after 1957. She may very well have died. Lying is ,well, lying. There are big ones and even bigger ones. The point is to hide the Truth, which has been done. Is there a limit to the Devil's lying?
Suppose Sr. Lucy died in 1957.
In order for your theory to even be plausible, I must accept the following as fact:
1) Nobody at the convent was aware Sr. Lucy died (or, they were in collusion with the old “switcharoo,” and maintained their silence, or, they were threatened into silence (which none have ever maintained);
2) Nobody at the convent, or elsewhere, recognized the new Lucy was not Lucy;
3) The fake Lucy would have to not only be a 24 hour/day role, familiar with Lucy’s mannerisms, etc, but would have had to sacrifice her own life to play the role (for nothing in return except a personal interest in seeing Fatima subverted);
4) Lucy’s family was involved in the fraud by saying nothing, or simply did not notice their own kin was replaced by an imposter;
5) All the Masonic Vatican would have had to do would be to order Lucy into silence; it would not be necessary for them to replace her with s body double for public appearances;
6) 60 years passed before some obscure sede invented this hair-brained theory. A normal person would/should contemplate why that is. It gives every indication of someone inventing a solution in order to make Fatima fit into their own narrative.
If someone would have told you about this theory when you were 16, you would have said that such a person would have lost their marbles: The pre-conciliar Vatican inserting a fake Lucy to subvert Fatima, apparently totally unconcerned that anyone might notice.
Not buying it. Not by a long shot.
Topic: Imposter Sister Lucy Contradict EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THE FATIMA MESSAGE (Read 6251 times)