CathInfo.com

I'm sure that Sean will read this carefully.  You put all the evidence together, and there's very little doubt.

Now, the reason SeanJohnson hates the theory is because it suggests that there may well have been conscious destroyers behind Vatican II and the New Mass, that these may in fact, as the sedevacantists have long asserted, been works of an infiltrating subversive enemy ... and not just a natural decay of the Church.  SeanJohnson and R&R prefer that the Church had decayed rather than that a non-Catholic enemy is responsible.  They would rather attribute the filth of Vatican II to Holy Mother Church than to Judaeo-Masonic Communists.

I see that you've lost it again, Sean.  You really need to seek the help of a mental health professional.

So Sean, do you think Bishop Williamson and the other 3 Bishops believe Cardinal Bertone/ Sodano's phony millenial reveal of the third secret? Do you think they are satisfied with that? Is this where you draw your line?
If there is lying from the Consilliar Church regarding the entire content of the third secret, why would it be so immposible to believe in a (zio-masonic) conspiracy to shut down ALL of the Fatima message including the disappearance of the true seer? Cui bono?