The insertion of  S.Lucy the imposter changes the course of history,Vll, the apostasy of the Church ( Including Paulo Vl and Vll?)and the Church's subversion of the greatest message from Heaven to mankind since the time of the Apostles.  

Certain R&R groups would have to admit that their pet reply for all the nonsense since Vatican II, "diabolical disorientation", is bunch of hooey.

The crowd is always afraid to say anything good about the Dimond's, and every time I see someone cow down to the crowd, I write something to the effect that:

I like the Dimond's they are not afraid to speak the truth no matter the consequences. They have conviction and internal fortitude.

You are right Last Tradican. I felt the need to predicate my post on the Dimonds with ill will to make it a more " palatable" post.  Sorry . I do recognize that.  I truly  don't abide by all of their claims,  but they were certainly right here.

You people must have been smoking lots of weed.  You are ships which have broken loose from their moorings, and are now tossed about at sea by every hair-brained theory invented.  In that regard, it is interesting to note the preponderance of sedes promoting this nonsense (which corroborates my observation).

This response typifies the level of your "thinking".  If you actually read the link provided in the OP, there are dozens of contradictions between Sister Lucy II and the original known Sister Lucy.  If they are indeed both the same, the real Sister Lucy, then Fatima was a scam of monumental proportions.  But, given the Church's strong endorsement of the apparitions, we can safely rule that out.  So what remains is that either 1) Sister Lucy II was an imposter, or 2) Sister Lucy II had been brainwashed/drugged into contradicting her previous statements.  Then you throw in the evidence about how she doesn't look anything like the original Sister Lucy, the conclusion is #1.

In response, you have not made a single reasonable argument to the contrary, but simply emote and make personal attacks.  Your response to the evidence is that we have been smoking weed.  SeanJohnson, it is clear that you have deep emotional and mental problems.

We know that the Communists had deeply infiltrated the Church, the very thing Our Lady at Fatima was warning about.  After the Iron Curtain purportedly fell, the information that came out of the former Soviet Union was that one of their favorite tactics was the use of doubles; several of their leaders had multiple doubles.

Roncalli was known to be bosom buddies with the Communists.  Montini was a Communist agent who ratted out bishops behind the Iron Curtain and got them killed.  Wojtyla, a suspected "Peace Priest," was touring the United States on a lecture tour while Cardinal Wyszynski was under house arrest and Cardinal Mindszenty was being tortured.  Bergoglio is a known Marxist.  So we see concretely the "errors of Russia" (Judaeo-Masonic atheistic government) infiltrating the Church and manifesting itself as Vatican II.

:baby:

I am not a sede. I am an R and R under Bishop Zendejas but I don't see the need to lockstep my thinking in regard to this crisis. I think we are all looking for for reasonable explanations for things that we are airing out on this forum. We may never get them and ultimately will have to chalk this whole thing up to the mysterious allowing Will of God. Meanwhile I choose not to stick my head in the sand and I am not afraid of looking for answers in unusual places.Truth can come in a myriad of ways. By the way, Fatima is an approved apparition and the four Bishops DID make a consecration to OLOF at Bishop Zendejas' Episcopal Consecration. So- Fatima is certainly in the mix.

:baby:

I see that you've lost it again, Sean.  You really need to seek the help of a mental health professional.

So Sean, do you think Bishop Williamson and the other 3 Bishops believe Cardinal Bertone/ Sodano's phony millenial reveal of the third secret? Do you think they are satisfied with that? Is this where you draw your line?
If there is lying from the Consilliar Church regarding the entire content of the third secret, why would it be so immposible to believe in a (zio-masonic) conspiracy to shut down ALL of the Fatima message including the disappearance of the true seer? Cui bono?