Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 12

Author Topic: Imposter Sister Lucy Contradict EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THE FATIMA MESSAGE  (Read 6214 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Imposter Sister Lucy Contradict EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THE FATIMA MESSAGE
« Reply #35 on: October 16, 2019, 08:27:32 AM »
Logged

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Imposter Sister Lucy Contradict EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THE FATIMA MESSAGE
« Reply #36 on: October 16, 2019, 08:43:44 AM »
Quote
Who said kidnapping?
Having a fake Sr Lucy would be as simple as her Mother Superior telling her she can't talk with anyone or leave her room without permission.  Then Vatican officials bring out an imposter nun to pal around with +JPII and give "interviews".  Sr Lucy, being a saint, would comply with any and all orders, and she wouldn't break the secret that she had never left the convent.  It's that simple.
.
Notice also that subsequent interviews with the real Sr Lucy, where she said that the 1980s consecration wasn't totally acceptable, and the other interview where she used the phrase "diabolical disorientation" were all done at the convent. 
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Imposter Sister Lucy Contradict EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THE FATIMA MESSAGE
« Reply #37 on: October 16, 2019, 08:48:23 AM »
I believe that Sister Lucy was spared by God from having to attend the New Mass.  I do not believe that she lived to see that day.
Logged

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Imposter Sister Lucy Contradict EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THE FATIMA MESSAGE
« Reply #38 on: October 16, 2019, 08:52:05 AM »
So I found this (from the Dimonds):
---------------------------------

Readers can take this for what it is worth (and it is not essential in any way to the facts above which prove that there was indeed an impostor Sr. Lucy), but a few years back we received a very disturbing letter.  We received a letter from a woman (a traditional Catholic convert) whose family was involved in the higher-echelons of the Illuminati and Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.  We also spoke to this woman both before and after she sent it.  There was much more in the letter and in the telephone conversations that added context and credibility to her claim, but we can only give a portion of the letter below.  As hard as this may be to believe, we really did receive the following letter and speak at length with this woman (she asked that we withhold her name for obvious reasons):

Quote
“Dear Brothers of Holy Family Monastery… As I told you on the phone I have some very dark relatives…[a world famous Freemason] is the brother of [x- name removed to preserve anonymity of author] who was married to my Grand Aunt.  All of my relatives on my mother’s side were 33rd degree Illuminati Freemasons.  My Grandparents were in Eastern Star… I know I must sound like a screaming weirdo by now.  I am not… When I was five my Mother hosted a gathering.  There are many things that went on that are too gruesome to put in print about these gatherings.  They are basically sacrificing to satan to put it briefly.  I had a new baby brother named
  • … My mother didn’t know ahead of time [that x] was to be part of the ‘ceremonies’.  They were going to put him in what looked like a large brass wok [and torture him] in order to tell the future. …[thankfully, this didn’t happen because of intervening events]… [But] One of the things that was said that awful day was they had just killed sister Lucy (I thought they were talking about a sister I didn’t know I had that they had killed).  When I asked they said ‘No stupid…she’s a nun’  It only made sense years later what this meant.  It was 1958, late Oct when this happened.  [I remember because my brother had just been born].  I know that I sound like a mad woman but it is the truth…”[/font][/font][/color][/size]
We have spoken with this woman at length; she is a traditional Catholic convert, and we believe that she is telling the truth.  But regardless of whether one accepts this testimony or not, the fact is that there was an impostor Sr. Lucy.
Logged

Offline SeanJohnson

Re: Imposter Sister Lucy Contradict EVERY SINGLE ASPECT OF THE FATIMA MESSAGE
« Reply #39 on: October 16, 2019, 08:54:57 AM »
Quote from: SeanJohnson on October 16, 2019, 08:12:26 AM
Suppose Sr. Lucy died in 1957.

In order for your theory to even be plausible, I must accept the following as fact:

1) Nobody at the convent was aware Sr. Lucy died (or, they were in collusion with the old “switcharoo,” and maintained their silence, or, they were threatened into silence (which none have ever maintained);

2) Nobody at the convent, or elsewhere, recognized the new Lucy was not Lucy;

3) The fake Lucy would have to not only be a 24 hour/day role, familiar with Lucy’s mannerisms, etc, but would have had to sacrifice her own life to play the role (for nothing in return except a personal interest in seeing Fatima subverted);

4) Lucy’s family was involved in the fraud by saying nothing, or simply did not notice their own kin was replaced by an imposter;

5) All the Masonic Vatican would have had to do would be to order Lucy into silence; it would not be necessary for them to replace her with s body double for public appearances;

6) 60 years passed before some obscure sede invented this hair-brained theory.  A normal person would/should contemplate why that is.  It gives every indication of someone inventing a solution in order to make Fatima fit into their own narrative.

If someone would have told you about this theory when you were 16, you would have said that such a person would have lost their marbles: The pre-conciliar Vatican inserting a fake Lucy to subvert Fatima, apparently totally unconcerned that anyone might notice.

Not buying it.  Not by a long shot.
Reposting 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10 ... 12
« previous next »