Bishop Fellay has given Bishop Williamson this order in good keeping with the teachings of separation of Church and State.

Separation of Church and State is a heresy.

Although I ceased attending its chapels because of its new relationship with Rome, has anyone docuмented the changes they have seen in SSPX parishes throughout the world in order to get evidence of a general shift in policy? Because of language differences, I feel we are in the dark regarding the general picture. For example, France was a lively place for trads. What is the picture now? I once had a French contact who championed the cause of Bp. Tissier but that source dried up.

As I review the various postings on this thread, I see no where the question raised as to the manner in which Bp. W was given +F's ultimatum.  Three things:
1) +W hired a lawyer associated with the Nat'l Democratic Party of Germany, a party which is fully legal, is recognized in that country, and operates within German law.  He can not have been identified as a practicing "nαzι", even by the liberal German political establishment standards, since nαzιsim in Germany is illegal, and has been since after WWII.  Folks who actively espouse nαzιsm are quickly rounded up and prosecuted.
2) So, +F is just plain off base in attempting to conflate this lawyer, and by extension, +W, with nαzιsm.
3)  All that aside, why did not +F go directly, privately to +W and express his displeasure privately?  Did he do so initially and did +W refuse to obey the former's request to drop the new hire?  Are we then forced to speculate that +F had no choice but to publish his threats worldwide?
I choose to believe that spreading calumny against +W through the media has become +F's MO.  He is using to media in an attempt to get rid of +W.  The media have become his unspoken allies.

In August I said:

Bp. Fellay's partners in 'dialogue' will not allow a man of stature to legitimize forbidden thoughts about the sacred 'h0Ɩ0cαųst.' As Bp. Fellay said, "The problem is that [Bp. Williamson's "h0Ɩ0cαųst"] comments have been linked to his office." Rather than make a martyr of him by throwing him in prison and risking opening a public debate over whether the state can force a religious figure to assent to beliefs originating outside his religion, they're calling his sanity into question. It's not just hostility, they're trying to make his words of no effect by leading people to think he's unstable, and Bp. Fellay is playing the lead role. He's not just saying that he's wrong, he's calling him "uranium" and a "grenade" and he laments that he must contain this dangerous, unstable element:

Bishop Fellay likens Bp Williamson to uranium, “it's dangerous when you have it but you simply can’t leave it by the side of the road."

http://sspxthepriesthood.com/fellay.shtml

"It’s like, if you have a grenade in your hand in the middle of a crowd. What do you do with it? Can you throw it?"

http://saltandlighttv.org/blog/?p=5071

In fact, Bp. Williamson has been far more consistent in his thoughts than Bp. Fellay. And Bp. Fellay's escalating public character assassination of a brother bishop is below even the Vatican scoundrels that he's ingratiating himself with. I suspect that this smear campaign is groundwork covering the possibility of Bp. Williamson being expelled or leaving of his own will. A possibility which Bp. Fellay openly accounted for in Der Spiegel in March 2009:

SPIEGEL: So why don't you exclude Williamson from the society?

Fellay: That will happen if he denies the h0Ɩ0cαųst again.

Clearly, Rome, the money people and the rabbis want Bp. Williamson out of the society. They're not going to allow a 'h0Ɩ0cαųst' heretic to gain credibility as would come with an SSPX agreement with Rome. This is terribly frustrating to the ambitions of Bp. Fellay as he wonders aloud, how to handle this "dangerous" element. If he was a priest, rest assured, he would be thrown overboard and the SSPX would be free of the 'h0Ɩ0cαųst denial' stigma.

It's problematic to these parties; the potential that lies with Richard Williamson being a Bishop and a teacher and having credibility with large numbers of 'truth seekers', what could happen if he's not contained and silenced. Hence Bp. Fellay's comments that Bp. Williamson is "uranium" that "you simply can’t leave by the side of the road" and a "grenade" that you can't throw into a crowd. They're destroying his reputation and calling his stability into question, preemptively blackening any endeavor he might have outside the society before they cast him out.

I believe they're attempting to provoke him to either leave of his own will or to some statement that could be rationalized as justification for expulsion. It's no different from how the Israelis and their U.S. lackeys attempt to get wars going against non-violent people while appearing to be in the right. Bp. Williamson has handled this all with remarkable humility. God willing, he will remain steadfast in imitation of Christ. If they act, it will be clear that they're persecuting a good man.

Fellay is acting worse than Pontius Pilate. He is condeming a man, who has told nothing but the truth, with the consent of the powerful. Pilate tried to cop out and wash his hands of Christ's death. Bishop Fellay is promoting Bishop Williamsons destruction.

Fellay is acting worse than Pontius Pilate. He is condeming a man, who has told nothing but the truth, with the consent of the powerful. Pilate tried to cop out and wash his hands of Christ's death. Bishop Fellay is promoting Bishop Williamsons destruction.

maybe the Society could get a new head elected....?? how would that work? do?

And the laypeople are too sheeplike.  

Or cultish in their misguided loyalty.