Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Illicit Promulgation  (Read 450 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline older salt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Reputation: +3/-1
  • Gender: Male
Illicit Promulgation
« on: September 21, 2018, 09:54:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Hi
    Does anyone have hard Church  docuмent proof that the New Order was not promulgated licitly?
    Logged

    Offline Struthio

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1650
    • Reputation: +453/-366
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Illicit Promulgation
    « Reply #1 on: September 21, 2018, 10:06:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: older salt on September 21, 2018, 09:54:12 PM
    Hi
    Does anyone have hard Church  docuмent proof that the New Order was not promulgated licitly?

    Hi

    A new rite cannot be promulgated licitly. The church has received and approved rites. New rites are neither received nor approved.


    Quote from: Council of Trent, Session VII, On the Sacraments, Canon 13
    If anyone says that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, accustomed to be used in the administration of the sacraments, may be despised or omitted by the ministers without sin and at their pleasure, or may be changed by any pastor of the churches, whomsoever, to other new ones, let him be anathema.

    To say that Paul VI (or whoever else) licitly promulgated new rites is to say that there is a pastor of the churches who may change the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church. But to say this is to utter heresy.
    Logged
    Men are not bound, or able to read hearts; but when they see that someone is a heretic by his external works, they judge him to be a heretic pure and simple ... Jerome points this out. (St. Robert Bellarmine)

    Offline older salt

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 12
    • Reputation: +3/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Illicit Promulgation
    « Reply #2 on: September 21, 2018, 10:31:50 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Was the NO promulgated licitly? It is not called by Rome as a newRite but a New Order.

    From what I have heard from an IBP priest as well as what I have read from dependable sources, there seems to be doubt.
    Logged

    Offline Struthio

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1650
    • Reputation: +453/-366
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Illicit Promulgation
    « Reply #3 on: September 21, 2018, 10:39:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: older salt on September 21, 2018, 10:31:50 PM
    Was the NO promulgated licitly? It is not called by Rome as a newRite but a New Order.

    From what I have heard from an IBP priest as well as what I have read from dependable sources, there seems to be doubt.

    You do not seem to like the quote. There is no true faith excluding it, though.

    Whatever they call it, fact is, they replaced the received and approved rights by new, fake, man made rights. Even Ratzinger admits the fact.
    Logged
    Men are not bound, or able to read hearts; but when they see that someone is a heretic by his external works, they judge him to be a heretic pure and simple ... Jerome points this out. (St. Robert Bellarmine)
    Pages: [1]
    « previous next »