If It Is In The Acta Apostolicae Sedis, It Is Official Teaching

Submitted by Dr. Thomas A. D... on Wed, 12/30/2015 - 03:06

The production of articles has slowed. I regret that this is the case. However, I am doing what I can as time and strength permit.

This new article, which includes information that will be familiar to longtime readers that will help newer readers to this site, amplifies the fact that everything that a true and legitimate Successor causes to be published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis is binding on Catholics.

Ah, as the Catholic Church cannot be the source of any kind of error, ambiguity or heresy, the fact that heretical propositions have been published by the conciliar “popes” is proof that they belong to a false religion and do not hold exercise any kind of legitimate magisterial authority. (Links are provided to two important posts at Novus Ordo Watch Wire that docuмent this fact beyond any doubt.)

Additionally, Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s recent blasphemy against Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and His Blessed Mother and Saint Joseph is discussed near the end of this rather long commentary.

I will return to the subject of the Midget Naturalists and their circus in my next commentary. There is not much “new” to be said that I have not written over a thousand times before on this site. However, I will make every effort to provide an analysis worthy of your time.

A dyslexic error, writing the year 1957 instead of 1958 for the beginning of the current line of antipopes, has been corrected after a reader kindly brought this to my attention. Some of the text had to be rewritten after it went "poof," and it was approaching three o'clock in the morning when the error occurred. I am sorry.

A continued blessed Christmas to you all!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Read more?:

http://www.christorchaos.com/?q=content/if-it-acta-apostolicae-sedis-it-official-teaching

Suprema Haec never appeared in AAS.

 :scratchchin:

Was it an authoritative letter approved by the Pope?  Do you know what type of assent the faithful are obliged to give to such a letter which merely reasserted the infallible teaching on no salvation outside the Church and the fact that non-members of the Catholic Church can saved within her more clearly than had been authoritative taught up until that point?  

If you are 100% reconciled with the issue why do you feel the need to bring up that issue on this thread which is against the rules of this forum?  Are you trying to make yourself feel good in regards to your doubts or is it for some other reason?

Quote

which merely reasserted the infallible teaching on no salvation outside the Church and the fact that non-members of the Catholic Church can saved within her

Very clear, one can be outside of the Church and saved inside of Her at the same time.  A perfect explanation of the conciliar doctrine of salvation.         :scratchchin:

Non-members can be saved "within" her.  Look carefully at the word "within" and then look up the meaning.  It means something entirely different than "outside".  

Please take this to the appropriate thread.