Nothing was omitted; God never expects the impossible from any of us.  To believe there is no pope at this time of our existence would be the same as what is prayed during Mass when one pope dies till another can be validly elected.  Interregnum!  

During that part, the priest prays for the intention of the Church which is the same as praying for the intention of a True pope, In otherwords, a True pope always has the intention of the Church before him. therefore there is no displeasure.  

Read this short link here recently:   https://www.cathinfo.com/the-sacred-catholic-liturgy-chant-prayers/praying-for-the-pope's-intentions-not-really/

  

This is the same SSPX that uses and/or defends the butchered 1962 Missal? Actually the Sedevacantists who use the pre-1955 Missal are the ones who are being more faithful to Quo Primum.

I am a revert to the faith since around 2010. I came into the church under pope Benedict 16. I have studied as much of the faith as I am able to comprehend. I am certainly no theologian and actually more of a tradesman. A couple of things have been persuading me that the sedevecantist are correct. Comparing the church we have now to what it was before V2 it seems clear that a defacto new religion was created. I know that dogma has remained the same however the actual teaching of priests and bishops ignores much pre v2 morality. There is no preaching on sɛҳuąƖ morality including contraception or adultery, no preaching on confession or sin, no preaching on our duty as Catholics to obey church teaching. I don't see how the current church bears any resemblance to what my Catholic ancestors experienced. Now we have a pope that is sort of just rolling out policy after policy that seems to diminish the churches teachings for example Amoris Lateticia. Any thought on why you don't flee the church are welcome. God Bless!

On the contrary...it is YOU who is being dogmatic. YOU keep bringing up dogma, which is in fact your false interpretation of dogma. I am the one saying that sedevacantism is the correct position to take in this stage of the apostasy. It is the Catholic position since it presumes DOLUS (not innocence) in a public heretic.

We have dogma in order to "bring it up", that's what it's there for - to bring it up in an effort to correct those who say the pope is not the pope, to let them know they will end up in hell if they keep saying it.

Pope Paul IV condemns YOUR ERRORS. You are the one who accepts the heretic, clown nose, blasphemous beanie brain Bergoglio as a true Catholic Pope, not Pope Paul IV nor myself.
You continue to bring up the same garbage Stubborn. Fr. Jenkins is a Sedevacantist. He would refute your illogical position. You are the one who keeps bringing up dogma. Just address the arguments or not.  

Pope Paul IV condemns the heretics in office, he's not condemning me grasshopper, have you ever actually read cuм ex? It doesn't look like you have as well you shouldn't. You should also watch the video - Fr. Jenkins is the one who said dogmatic sedes like yourself are not Catholic - and I agree with him so again, you demonstrate you don't know what you're even saying - but won't let that stop you.

Stubborn your hypocrisy is astounding. You just spent nearly your whole post condemning dogmatic sedevacantists, yet as I have stated numerous times, YOU are the one being dogmatic. Thanks for proving me right.

You call my quoting of the dogma that condemns you my hypocrisy, my dogma and my heresy. Whatever. 
Just do yourself a favor and stop saying the pope is not the pope, it's for your own good. 

Pope Pius IX word is good enough for me.

I can imagine his irrelevant response now "I will remain the Pope's good subject, but God's first".