Yeah, I've been complaining about this for years.  ANY question related to the crisis in the Church quickly blows up into a rehash of every single Sedevacantist vs. R&R argument ever made.  EVERY thread about a specific or limited aspect of the "Feeneyite" question turns into a full-blown rehash of the entire debate.  It gets old.  People need to confine themselves to the specific topic raised by the OP.  Not sure if there's a way to enforce this.

So, for instance, the thread about "Why so many Feeneyites on CI?" is a very narrow topic.  This should NOT have blown up into a debate of all things Feeneyism.  But it was inevitable.

It's a fantastic example, of echo chamber construction.

This is why I said: "Do not respond to women who debate (No problem answering the ladies who ask questions sincerely).

The same applies to bickering men who have nothing to offer in a discussion, if no one would respond to them, they would disappear. Like I said "Some men debate like women, taking everything personal, do not let them get your goat, they are like children. Would you debate with a child?"

There is no question that men do it too, but, like you, I associate taking things personally more with female posters.

You did not mention the flip side of this, which is to avoid making personal attacks.  I try to always address the argument itself, rather than comment on the person.  (I might not always succeed, but I try.)

Also, I find that learning whom one should ignore helps a lot.  Certain people or certain characteristics just push my buttons too much for me to deal with properly.  That's usually a situation where I should just walk away.

Sometimes there is a fine line between them.  I know that I struggle with this.  I really do not want to teach men or even seem like I am teaching men, but I do like to share Church teaching.

Thus far, best I've read, you do quite well in this regard ma'am; so, please don't scruple yourself to tatters about it. 

Too much is as bad as too little.

I wonder what they think of nuns teaching.  I merely repeat what the nuns taught me, and I too like to share Church teachings.

I thought that nuns taught children. Did nuns ever teach men before Vatican II?

I thought that nuns taught children. Did nuns ever teach men before Vatican II?

They also taught high school young men or if you prefer to say, boys, so be it.

However, consider St. Catherine of Siena who played an essential part in ending the Great Western Schism when she encouraged Blessed Pope Gregory XI in 1378.  Catholic history proves that many women taught the entire Church, both men, and women with their writings. 
 
Yet, if it bothers some men here that feel threatened they could put us on ignore, I don't know how to do it, but I remember DZ Please knows how maybe he will come along and tell the men here. OR we women can just post recipes and talk in the women's forum if you are afraid of teaching a man.
 
I myself never felt I was teaching anyone but just sharing my views, but if I am sinning, I better just leave altogether.  Never to offend God again for I have offended Him in the past too much.  
Blessings to all