Said hierarchy TAUGHT these things to the Church in Ecuмenical Council and said hierarchy promulgated the universal disicpline in question.
Maybe V2 used the word 'teach' and 'discipline' differently than in the past? When one deals with modernists/satanists, one has to follow Christ's advice:
Behold I send you as sheep in the midst of wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents and simple as doves. (Matt 10:16).We know now, 50 years later, that V2 was run by wolves in sheeps clothing. We also know that Christ's Church will be protected from Hell. The devil also knows this. So why does he want to spend his time trying to change doctrine or officially teach error when he can get the same result by making people THINK it was changed. As many masons have been quoted as saying - the orginal goal - to destroy the church - has been changed. They know they cannot destroy Her, so they plan to USE Her to lead the world to humanism and a global religion, which is part of the anti-christ govt. By making the faithful THINK the Church had "updated its approach to the world" then the gates are open for hell not to prevail over Her, but to enter the city and cause destruction. Different tactic, same result.
So we must think like 'wolves' and if we know their plans, we can work backwards and see the traps they laid, even if 50 years ago. The large trap was the 'shock and awe' of an ecuмenical council, which they knew that the faithful would ASSUME would be orthodox - it would be ASSUMED that it would be "just like all the other councils". But where is the rule than an ecuмenical council HAS to be dogmatic? There is none. This is trick #1.
Where is the rule that says that a council has to be precise, define dogma, and issue binding legal decrees? Even though that is the "normal" way they operate, it doesn't mean that councils HAVE TO operate that way. Trick #2.
There were many other smaller tricks, but these are the main 2. If we know we are dealing with cunning, pharisee-like infiltrators, we must be on guard. We must 'be wise as serpents' for our enemy worships the serpent of Eden. Therefore we cannot presume they will fight fair; we must presume they will fight in any way that the law allows. This is why we must presume that when V2 uses the word 'teach' or 'discipline' that it means something different than for previous councils. For EVERYTHING related to V2 was novel in its approach, even the definition of the words themselves.
This is why I say that V2 didn't teach or bind anyone to believe anything new. Who were the "agents" of communicating the council? Who really "interpreted" the council and "taught" the faithful what it said? The media, the bishops and the priests - none of whom are infallible, none of whom are protected from indefectibility, none of whom was prevented from introducing exaggerations, liberalism or marxism into their "teachings" so that V2 was way more liberal than what the 'fine print' actually said.
Then we get to the idea of 'discipline'. Who told everyone that V2 "must be obeyed"? The bishops, the priests, the media. Just like with the new mass - they told the faithful that "the 'old mass' is gone; it has been replaced." Well, they lied. So they lied with V2, in that it was not binding, nor doctrinal, nor catholic. The docuмents tell a different story than the "clergy" did.
Topic: How many sedes are logged on to the forum right now? (Read 192116 times)