Apparently the quote didn't stay, so here it is again:
Pope Pius XI
"But it is an outstanding achievement of St Robert, that the rights and privileges divinely bestowed upon the Supreme Pontiff, and those also which were not yet recognised by all the children of the Church at that time, such as the infallible magisterium of the Pontiff speaking ex cathedra, he both invincibly proved and most learnedly defended against his adversaries. Moreover he appeared even up to our times as a defender of the Roman Pontiff of such authority that the Fathers of the Vatican Council employed his writings and opinions to the greatest possible extent."
This deserves a great big, fat, hairy, face palm. Here we have, of all people, dogmatic sedes, using another Catholic saint and pope, a pope who praises the saint for being a DEFENDER OF THE POPE, in their felonious their attempts to vindicate sedeism.
BD spouts: "
Like I told you before, Pax...If Bellarmine was good enough for the Fathers of Vatican I, he's good enough for me." Do you dogmatic sedes even read what you post? How can you POSSIBLY miss the reason WHY the Council employed St. Robert's writings? Where on earth do you see that they employed his teachings because he taught heretic popes lose their office?
Moreover he appeared even up to our times as a defender of the Roman Pontiff of such authority that the Fathers of the Vatican Council employed his writings and opinions to the greatest possible extent." To the Church, St. Robert was an AUTHORITATIVE DEFENDER OF POPES, yet to the dogmatic sedes, St. Robert vindicates dogmatic sedeism. Because such warped theology is typical among the dogmatic sedes, this is why I say the sedes must cease using Catholic saints and Church teachings.
Thanks for the quote BD and 2V for re-quoting it as it exemplifies the different religion of dogmatic sedes.
It would not surprise me in the slightest if the dogmatic sedes didn't start using this quote repeatedly and exclusively to vindicate their sedeism from now on.