Materially yes but formally no. Again very sedeprivationist.
It's called by someone "Against Sedevacantism" but what he's really against is just DOGMATIC sedevacantism ... if you listen
very early on says that Francis is, "like his predecessors, but in a very clear way", a "notorious", "open" "public" "heretic" 2:12 - 2:27
5:00 - 5:30 -- that there's in Rome a man dressed in white who is the visible (aka IMO "material") head of the Catholic Church
5:45 - 5:55 -- Vatican II docuмents contain heresies so these docuмents can be rejected
... then following that the New Mass and Canon Law are bad and "we can get rid of it"
NOTICE: no sifting ... just throw it all out
then ... papacy is unlike other offices. Cardinals merely designate the person but he receives authority from God
7:13 - 7:30 question is what happens when a pope is a "manifest heretic" since "we do grant that this pope is a public manifest heretic"
11:45 - 11:50 Paul VI was a Mason and gαy
12:00 - 12:05 Sister Lucy silenced and possibly replaced
at one point he conflates the Dimonds with "St. Benedict Center" and rejects their position that the Fatima consecration of Russia has been done
8:25 - 8:45 ... introduces "dogmatic" sedevacantism
then goes on to reject it because there are many authoritative theologians who argue against the Bellarmine position of ipso facto depositus
40:30 - 40:40 Rome has lost the faith
41:00 - 41:35 [Conciliar Church] is a heretical Church ... Francis is still the pope because heresy does not (in his opinion) lead to automatic loss of office, but he is "impounded and we have to separate from him" (based on it being a disputed question)
43:00 - 43:10 Catholic Church would explode and lose its "visibility on earth" (aka material visibility)
44:50 - 45:10 it's "beyond any doubt" that Pope Francis has lost the faith and he won't argue with sedevacantists on that because "it would be ridiculous for me to deny that" ... then rejects SSPX distinction between modernists and heretics
then ... we are bound to separate from them due to risk of contagion; they are "vomiting heresies all the time" ... commends Traditio and NovusOrdoWatch
48:50 - 50:10 if there's no pope how do we restart the Church? [again sounds like sedeprivationism]
51:06 - 51:20 we are just keeping the little white man over there just to keep us together ... that's not much (just a material source of unity) ... just a "tiny link" which is still vital to us
then goes on to discuss Cajetan's position and that of John of St. Thomas
such a pope is prevented from formally exercising his office ... "necessarily rendered impotent as being head of the Church" (formal loss of office as in sedeprivationism)
[THAT'S THE END OF HOUR 1 ... will go through the next hour later]
What little I watched of the video is quite good, from about 1:45 to 1:59.
At about the 1:55 minute mark, Father says...
"David is angry at the one who takes down the anointed of the Lord. It's an anointing of God; it comes from God. The central argument of John of St. Thomas is that this anointing comes from God and it's very hard to dissolve it." (I assume that he is referring to the election of the Pope).
At the 1:56 mark, Father says...
"I am not arguing down the line that they are losing office, or that they do not deserve to lose office, or that God hasn't planned to make them lose office. [...] By law, they should be immediately removed from office. The problem is that the See of Rome is judged by no one. It's on the top. We need to keep the constitution of the Church intact, [for] when the papacy will at last start to run on its feet."
And at the 1:57 minute mark, Father says:
[...] And what is missed by the sedevacantists is that we can relate to the poor souls who are marooned in the Novus Ordo church, because I see it in the Philippines, the little Filipinos we are arrived in the village of (can't understand the name of the village), and we are taking them out of the Novus Ordo parish and they are asking: are you with the pope over there in Rome? And my answer is "yes." And there is no lie there. Where as if I were sedevacantist, how I would (escape?) to lie. You would have to make a gigantic mental reservation to get away with that lie. So it has put us in a much better position."
There's so much more that I'd like to quote when I have time, from Fr. Chazal's video. Maybe tomorrow. He comments about how some sedevacantists have gone straight from sedevacantism to the Novus Ordo, and that there must be some liberalism there for that to happen.