Do you know if Fr. Chazal believes the conciliar church to be the Catholic Church?
Materially yes but formally no. Again very sedeprivationist.
It's called by someone "Against Sedevacantism" but what he's really against is just DOGMATIC sedevacantism ... if you listen
very early on says that Francis is, "like his predecessors, but in a very clear way", a "notorious", "open" "public" "heretic" 2:12 - 2:27
5:00 - 5:30 -- that there's in Rome a man dressed in white who is the visible (aka IMO "material") head of the Catholic Church
5:45 - 5:55 -- Vatican II docuмents contain heresies so these docuмents can be rejected
... then following that the New Mass and Canon Law are bad and "we can get rid of it"
NOTICE: no sifting ... just throw it all out
then ... papacy is unlike other offices. Cardinals merely designate the person but he receives authority from God
7:13 - 7:30 question is what happens when a pope is a "manifest heretic" since "we do grant that this pope is a public manifest heretic"
11:45 - 11:50 Paul VI was a Mason and gαy
12:00 - 12:05 Sister Lucy silenced and possibly replaced
at one point he conflates the Dimonds with "St. Benedict Center" and rejects their position that the Fatima consecration of Russia has been done
8:25 - 8:45 ... introduces "dogmatic" sedevacantism
then goes on to reject it because there are many authoritative theologians who argue against the Bellarmine position of
ipso facto depositus40:30 - 40:40 Rome has lost the faith
41:00 - 41:35 [Conciliar Church] is a heretical Church ... Francis is still the pope because heresy does not (in his opinion) lead to automatic loss of office, but he is "impounded and we have to separate from him" (based on it being a disputed question)
43:00 - 43:10 Catholic Church would explode and lose its "visibility on earth" (aka material visibility)
44:50 - 45:10 it's "beyond any doubt" that Pope Francis has lost the faith and he won't argue with sedevacantists on that because "it would be ridiculous for me to deny that" ... then rejects SSPX distinction between modernists and heretics
then ... we are bound to separate from them due to risk of contagion; they are "vomiting heresies all the time" ... commends Traditio and NovusOrdoWatch
48:50 - 50:10 if there's no pope how do we restart the Church? [again sounds like sedeprivationism]
51:06 - 51:20 we are just keeping the little white man over there just to keep us together ... that's not much (just a material source of unity) ... just a "tiny link" which is still vital to us
then goes on to discuss Cajetan's position and that of John of St. Thomas
such a pope is prevented from formally exercising his office ... "necessarily rendered impotent as being head of the Church" (formal loss of office as in sedeprivationism)
[THAT'S THE END OF HOUR 1 ... will go through the next hour later]