If the sedes have faith in the last "true" pope, then they would accept his laws, all of them, each and every one of them - particularly the law stating the man elected is the true pope.
If sede's have any faith at all in the last "true" pope, then they should in fact be very grateful to him - especially in this crisis where there is much confusion, that the last "true" pope did his duty and did not leave us wondering who the heck the true pope really is in these confusing times.
The Baltimore catechism though very good, is in need of having a few lessons corrected. It is a text book, not the Bible.
Stubborn et al, when you read what the TRUE popes are saying, have you ever considered their words about the election of a Pope was the election of a Pope within the Catholic Church, not the non-catholic, schismatic church of Vatican II. There is the difference.
How many times have I read here, over and over that Vatican II is not Catholic.
At best think of Vatican II as the schismatic Anglican or Orthodox churches. The True popes were not speaking about a church that fell away from Rome. Possession does not mean OWNERSHIP.
This is why there can be no meeting of the minds because posters quote this theologian and that abrogation but those words were all meant for normal times. Who would have thought, even though the Bible talks about the Great Apostasy, who would have thought it would come in our lifetime.
Stubborn, define the Great Apostasy.Also, I am still waiting for someone, to come along and explain how a True Vicar of Christ can continue to break Divine Law, not only once but daily the First Commandment and still be considered a True Vicar of Christ.
Words of Stubborn --> The Baltimore catechism though very good, is in need of having a few lessons corrected. It is a text book, not the Bible.
And you chide others!