Right. They do not claim that such are not Catholic ... well, for the most part (and I’ll get to this later) but priests are permitted and even enjoined by Canon Law not to give Holy Communion to public sinners, those immodestly dressed, etc. in that it would cause scandal. They rely upon this to withhold the Sacraments. I know Fr. Jenkins very well and he does not hold that everyone in the NO is a non-Catholic.
OK so I get the immodest dress thing, and other public sinners. Is his argument, then, that attending an NO or Indult Mass makes one a "public sinner?" And if so what would be the basis for that? How would communing such people be "scandalous?"
To be clear, I am not accusing anyone of schism, I'm just trying to understand how it *isn't*