Forgive me if this opens a can of sede worms. But how do you defend the current Pope and protect the integrity of the Church and her Authority over mankind at the same time? 

Here is an example from a post today on a non-denominational healthy moms group I am in. The post was in regards to a concerned mother and the recent whistleblower at Project Veritas. She said she wondered what the Pope would think about it. So several in the comments are saying that the Catholic’s Leader has thrown us all under the bus even including non-Catholics. 
Here is some of those comments…







So if you were going to defend the Church and Her Head, what would you say?

The Church Christ founded, knew from the start, that radical Jєωs would be taken on by Satan/demons.  To be pretenders, to take over not just Church but in all high places, which you see today.  God has permitted this. Chapter 12 of Daniel says the continual sacrifice of the Mass will end. That will last about 3 and a half years.

Church knew, therefore popes said, no support or protection for Jєωs.  Inquistions questioned those clergy who were suspected of being pretenders.  Nations protected their borders of Jєωs.

After Pius X, there was a change, where  no support and no  protection of Jєωs ,are no longer mentioned.

Satan will not waste his time with other sects.  He will destroy where truth and precious blood is.

Papal teachings are only ex Cathedra if or when a pope is speaking on matters of faith or morals and when he explicitly states that he is speaking with the full authority of the Church as in Pro Quorum.

BTY It is my understanding that a moto proprio is not ex Cathedra unless specifically stated as infallible.

True, but, we are still required to give non-infallible docuмents, such as his motu, the assent of faith because it is still part of the Ordinary Magisterium. Not just those things ex Cathedra, which was condemned by Pope Pius IX.

As for the question at hand, just lay it out plainly: the man is a heretic who has publicly apostatized from the Catholic faith and therefore we need not obey him. You don't need to get into the nuances of the various trad positions with non-Catholics.

True, but, we are still required to give non-infallible docuмents, such as his motu, the assent of faith because it is still part of the Ordinary Magisterium. Not just those things ex Cathedra, which was condemned by Pope Pius IX.

As for the question at hand, just lay it out plainly: the man is a heretic who has publicly apostatized from the Catholic faith and therefore we need not obey him. You don't need to get into the nuances of the various trad positions with non-Catholics.

To qualify as Ordinary Magisterium it must be 'what has always and everywhere been taught by the Church.'

Nobody can name even one thing that Jorge has done or said that is 'what has always and everywhere been taught by the Church.'

As far as I am concerned Jorge is the "destroyer not a pastor… not canonically elected" about whom St. Francis of Assisi warned us. Jorge also seems to fit the bill of 2 Thess 2:4.

I would tell them the truth. Benedict XVI (and his immediate predecessors) are fallible human beings. However, we Catholics believe, on faith, that in essential matters defined in Pastor Aeternus, an authentic Pope never errs. On the other hand, anyone can see, by examining the history of the Catholic Church, that many true popes erred in non-essential matters. So there is no problem to explain if you accept that Benedict is still and will be Pope until his death.

The usurper (Daniel 11:21) Cardinal Bergoglio is another matter. He is not actually the Pope, aka the Vicar of Christ. He is the False Prophet. We are in "the end times," specifically the period called "the birth pangs" or "the beginning of the Sorrows" by Our Lord. The Bible and many approved prophecies have warned about this. St. Francis of Assisi, Quito, LaSalette, Leo XIII's St. Michael prayer, Fatima, Akita, etc. all specifically predict a period of apostasy at the highest levels of the Church. That same apostasy was referred to by St. Paul in 2 Thessalonians 2, and it is happening now with Bergoglio.

The question of indefectibility does not come into play because there is still a Church with a visible, although impeded, head (Benedict XVI) and a mystical head (Jesus). The Church is still present, and will be until the end, in the faithful Remnant. In Zechariah 10, the prophet says:

2 For the idols have spoken what was unprofitable, and the diviners have seen a lie, and the dreamers have spoken vanity: they comforted in vain: therefore they were led away as a dock: they shall be afflicted, because they have no shepherd.

He is talking about the bishops leading the laity astray. There is no true shepherd because Benedict has been imprisoned and Bergoglio and his henchmen are destroyers of souls, as you will soon see with the upcoming Synod on Synodality. But clearly, this prophecy implies that "the Church" is going through difficulties near the end, just before Jesus comes back. "They shall be afflicted." The "they" are Catholics.

Bottom line: everything we are seeing was prophesied in the Bible. Get out of the weeds. Look at the big picture. Recognize where you are in salvation history. Again, if you haven't figured it out yet, you are in "the end times." All the prophecies will, most likely, play out within this decade. Do not fear. Love God and neighbor and utilize the Sacraments as long as they are available. They are likely to become scarce in the near future.