Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: How can a true pope be an "enemy of the faith"?  (Read 9993 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
How can a true pope be an "enemy of the faith"?
« Reply #15 on: June 29, 2016, 11:11:43 AM »
What does the papal oath have to do with whether or not the pope could be an enemy of the faith?

The papal oath won't stop him from using his authority to try to destroy (if that were possible) the Church, all it will do is add to his offenses against God when he breaks his oath - which they don't take any longer anyway.

 


How can a true pope be an "enemy of the faith"?
« Reply #16 on: June 29, 2016, 11:31:59 AM »
Quote from: Stubborn
What does the papal oath have to do with whether or not the pope could be an enemy of the faith?

The papal oath won't stop him from using his authority to try to destroy (if that were possible) the Church, all it will do is add to his offenses against God when he breaks his oath - which they don't take any longer anyway.

 


It was mentioned to refute
Pax Vobis.


How can a true pope be an "enemy of the faith"?
« Reply #17 on: June 29, 2016, 12:08:05 PM »
Quote from: Stubborn
Quote from: MyrnaM
Stubborn,  you seem to ignore the fact that the elected Pope, must be Catholic with a good willed intention to do as the past True popes have always done in order to be a valid election.  Divine Law

You need to read this: The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita

 The author quotes the actual Masonic docuмent, which both Pope Pius IX (1846-1878) and Pope Leo XIII (1878-1903) asked to be published. This docuмent describes the Masons' diabolical strategy to destroy the Church by infecting her leaders with Liberal ideas. Tells how they do not desire a masonic Pope, but rather a Pope infected with their ideas. Touches on Liberalism, the French Revolution, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Ecuмenism, Modernism, the modernist conspiracy at Vatican II, and much more! An eye-opening book that every Catholic must read!


As I said, even if he is not pope, there is nothing anyone can do about it, if there was some thing someone could do about it, it would have been done 50 years ago. And because the dogma states we cannot get to heaven unless we are subject to him, I am not willing to risk my eternity on my opinion when everything we see with our own eyes testifies that he is pope - albeit a terribly rotten and heretical pope.



Fine!  Stubborn you can be subject to him all the way as he leads you and SSPX into the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr that the Illuminati Masons of which you are subject to are.  


Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
How can a true pope be an "enemy of the faith"?
« Reply #18 on: June 29, 2016, 03:56:46 PM »
Quote from: MyrnaM
Quote from: Stubborn
Quote from: MyrnaM
Stubborn,  you seem to ignore the fact that the elected Pope, must be Catholic with a good willed intention to do as the past True popes have always done in order to be a valid election.  Divine Law

You need to read this: The Permanent Instruction of the Alta Vendita

 The author quotes the actual Masonic docuмent, which both Pope Pius IX (1846-1878) and Pope Leo XIII (1878-1903) asked to be published. This docuмent describes the Masons' diabolical strategy to destroy the Church by infecting her leaders with Liberal ideas. Tells how they do not desire a masonic Pope, but rather a Pope infected with their ideas. Touches on Liberalism, the French Revolution, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Ecuмenism, Modernism, the modernist conspiracy at Vatican II, and much more! An eye-opening book that every Catholic must read!


As I said, even if he is not pope, there is nothing anyone can do about it, if there was some thing someone could do about it, it would have been done 50 years ago. And because the dogma states we cannot get to heaven unless we are subject to him, I am not willing to risk my eternity on my opinion when everything we see with our own eyes testifies that he is pope - albeit a terribly rotten and heretical pope.



Fine!  Stubborn you can be subject to him all the way as he leads you and SSPX into the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr that the Illuminati Masons of which you are subject to are.  



I remain subject to him because that is the dogma, unless of course he commands something sinful.  I will continue to monitor this site and the news in case he ever utters anything Catholic that I need to be concerned with, but otherwise, to paraphrase St. Thomas More's departing words: I remain the pope's good subject, but God's first. For me, that is the safest, therefore the only route for me.


Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
How can a true pope be an "enemy of the faith"?
« Reply #19 on: June 29, 2016, 04:23:39 PM »
Quote from: An even Seven
Quote from: Stubborn
My view is that there is no way to prove the conciliar popes are not popes and proof is needed, that short of Divine Providence, there is nothing to stop a pope from doing what the conciliar popes have done. Nothing.  

Most sedevacantists proclaim that "the pope is not the pope", as though it were an indisputable fact rising from divine revelation - when the real fact is the pope was elected in the same manner as the previous +200 popes, so the presumption must side with the same validity as all the previous elections. Which means that the pope is the pope until another pope at some time in the future makes the declaration that the conciliar popes have not been popes. No one else has the authority to do anything about it - this is demonstrated by the last 58 years where not one single thing has been done about these heretical popes by anybody.

This teaching from Paul IV says that heresy automatically makes them not the pope.
cuм ex Apostolatus Officio...........


But Ibranyi decided that there have been no popes since 1130 due to their heresies - who are we to believe, him or popular opinion? Besides that, Pope Pius X and Pope Pius XII made different rules.

Pius XII's Vacantis Apostolicae Sedis of 1945 states:
Quote
No Cardinal can in any way be excluded from the active and passive election of the Supreme Pontiff on the pretext or by reason of any excommunication, suspension, interdict, or other ecclesiastical impediment whatsoever; We, in fact, suspend these censures only for the effect of an election of this sort; they will remain in their own force in other circuмstances....

....After this agreement has been furnished within a time limit to be determined by the prudent judgment of the Cardinals by a majority of votes (to the extent it is necessary), the man elected is instantly the true Pope, and he acquires and can exercise full and absolute jurisdiction over the whole world. Hence, if anyone dares to challenge the docuмents prepared in regard to any business whatsoever that comes from the Roman Pontiff before the coronation, We bind him with the censure of excommunication to be incurred ipso facto.



Which is to say that there is nothing to stop a heretical  cardinal from being elected a true pope.