Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”  (Read 837 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nottambula

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 182
  • Reputation: +70/-82
  • Gender: Female
How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
« on: September 12, 2019, 08:22:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
  • https://fromrome.wordpress.com/2019/09/11/how-benedict-has-defeated-francis/


    How Benedict has defeated “Francis”

     
    by The Editor



    by Br. Alexis Bugnolo


    Pope Benedict XVI, who has been lauded by many as a brilliant theologian, is in my opinion, a more brilliant chess player, for he has defeated the AntiChurch with the most incredibly subtle and effective manuever which could ever be conceived, and which takes a great deal of study to recognize, if you, like myself, took at face value the hearsay which has been put out for the last six years.

    Admittedly, the honor and glory for it belong first of all to God, Who enlightens all men and inspires them at times to do things mere mortals could never conceive of. But also, thanks goes to God for sending Our Lady to Fatima to reveal to Sr. Lucia a secret which has until this day remained hidden, so as to give sound counsel to the true Successor of Saint Peter in the End Times.

    How Pope John Paul II strengthened the Bulwark of the Church against the AntiChurch

    I believe that with that knowledge, Pope John Paul II did 3 things: first, he chose Joseph Ratzinger to come to Rome and prepared him to succeed him (perhaps because he sensed that Ratzinger had the gift of prophecy); second, in 1983, he added the term munus to canon 332 §2, to constrain all of his successors to the obligation of renouncing the Petrine Munus so as to resign the papacy; and third, in 1996, he promulgated a new law on Papal Elections, which would nullify any attempt of the AntiChurch to usurp the Papacy or elect successors to AntiPopes (by requiring that all valid conclaves meet within 20 days after the death of valid popes).

    Pope John Paul II warned the Church of the AntiChurch which was rising. He beatified Ann Catherine Emmerich to give papal approval to her own visions in this regard. It should not be surprising then, that in secret, or I should say, in the bright light of day, in papal acts he prepared the Church against that Evil to come!

    By these three acts, Pope John Paul II set the chess board and enabled his chosen successor, Ratzinger to enact a stratagem of deception to defeat the forces of darkness.

    The Forces of the AntiChurch struck quickly

    No sooner than Pope John Paul II had died that the St Gallen Mafia, which had been meeting in that Swiss town for some years, mobilized to put Bergoglio on the Apostolic Throne in the Conclave of 2005. Bergoglio, as is now known, garnered the most votes after Ratzinger. In his campaign to get elected he promised radical financial reforms in the Vatican, so he could pose as a savior and reformer, though his agenda was that of Cardinal Martini, to make the Church into the Bride of the Anti-Christ.

    Recently an Argentine Priest revealed, that Pope Benedict, soon after his election in 2005, had asked Bergoglio to be Secretary of State (see report here). Benedict intended by this offer to diffuse the conflict which arose in the Conclave, and to draw out the real intentions of Bergoglio. Bergoglio’s refusal manifested his deceit, because all the reasons given in the Conclave for his election, which in truth could be done by a Secretary of State, if honest, would have spurred him to accept Benedict’s offer. But without the papal authority, his evil and malign agenda could not be advanced. — By this sign of offering the olive branch of peace, Benedict signaled to his own supporters, that after himself there would come an Anti-pope (cf. Prophecy of St Malachy).

    With the threefold knowledge of the future had from the Third Secret, from Pope John Paul II and from his own experience in the CDF, Pope Benedict now knew what he had to do. He knew Bergoglio wanted power and would be blinded by its offer. He took preparations to defend the Church with tradition and as the pressure built from the St Gallen Mafia, he crafted their defeat in secret.

    Benedict knew that removing the Lavender Mafia from the Vatican was key to defending the Church. But as court docuмents revealed, in the WikiLeaks controversy, as that effort led to the destruction of the careers of many sodomites, they moved against Benedict to have him removed. His Pontificate had removed hundreds perverts from the clergy.

    As I have written before, there was in my estimation a formal attempt at a Coup d’etat (see report here). And this was actually put in motion, with the intent to effectively imprison Pope Benedict (see Report here). — The Conclave pact in 2005 among the warring factions of Ratzinger (Church) and Bergoglio (Anti-Church) also prepared the way (see report here). But, with their cause lost at that conclave, the St. Gallen Mafia would have to wait for Benedict to resign, because being old, he revealed that he was inclined to resign in a few years, anyhow. As he lingered on, however, their rage and impatience exploded.

    The restoration of the Ancient Mass (July 7, 2007) and the expansion of the permissions for its use (April 30, 2011) caused a general outburst among the wicked clerics. I myself know this took place in the Italian Bishop’s Conference in 2011, because a Bishop who attended told me how Cardinals and Bishops stood up, one after another, and said the most vile things against Benedict. I also know personally, from the testimony of a Sicilian Businessman, who was in Shanghai, that the Cardinal of Palermo had warned that Benedict could die within a year from poor health. The St Gallen Controlled Media expanded this and reported it as if the Cardinal has said that Benedict had a year to live or else. That report was published around Feb. 11, 2012! (note the date)
    [size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
    Benedict’s Master Stroke
    [/font][/size]

    Pope Benedict XVI then played his master stroke. In the Summer of 2012 he indicated to Cardinal Bertone that he was going to resign. He discussed the matter with no one but his secretary Ganswein and a few others. I believe that he wrote the text of abdication in the Fall of 2012. I also postulate that he intentionally showed the Latin text (the invalid one) and a faulty German translation (which makes it appear the Latin is a valid formula) to members of the St Gallen Mafia, to obtain their consent to it. By that act he sealed their doom.

    Because only one who was fluent in Latin and knowledgeable about Canon Law and who accepted the traditional metaphysics of the Church would be able to see that the resignation by that formula would be invalid. Ratzinger further prepared the ground by emphasizing for years before, that his favorite theologian was Saint Bonaventure. This caused scholars, like myself, to start studying St. Bonaventure’s Scholastic method for textual analysis of the signification of expressions, which is unparalleled among all the Doctors of the Church.

    On Feb. 11, 2013, he read out-loud in Consistory the text of the invalid formula. On Feb. 28, 2013 he explained that he had resigned the “active ministry”. The St. Gallen Mafia spread the word of a valid resignation. The rest is history.

    The only thing is, that Benedict began to give signs of the truth, not only for the sake of the Faithful, but to annoy the St Gallen Mafia. He kept wearing the papal cassock, retained the titles of Your Holiness and signed with PP. Benedictus XVI, and continued to give the papal blessing. He did these things to get faithful Catholics to examine the text of resignation and discover it was invalid. — He did this also, because, I believe, he was obeying Our Lady’s word at Fatima, in which She had revealed that there would come a time in which the Catholic world thought there were 2 popes, but only one of which was the true pope. The one who was the true Pope would continue to wear white, the other would usurp the office; and that the Anti-Church would attack the true Pope and the faithful gathered about him.

    By an invalid resignation Pope Benedict has canonically invalidated everything Bergoglio has done, can do, and can ever do! Bergoglio is now an AntiPope because of the clever trick Benedict played on him. And Bergoglio is so entangled by this stratagem of Benedict that he cannot admit its existence, because if he does, he must give up his claim to the papacy.

    If Benedict should die, then there will be no valid Successor of Saint Peter unless the pre-Bergoglian Cardinals meet in conclave within 20 days. Otherwise, as Pope John Paul II declares in the promulgation of Universi Dominici Gregis, at the end of the text, any action the Cardinal Electors take will be invalid. If they fail to do this, the Church will not be bereft of a pope, because, as Pope John Paul II taught in UDG’s prologue, the institution of the College is “not necessary for a valid election” of the Roman Pontiff: there is still the ancient Apostolic Law regarding the right of the Roman Church to elect the Pope.*
    [size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]
    Benedict has defeated “Francis”!

    [/font][/size]


    [size={defaultattr}][font={defaultattr}]

    Note: I wish to publicly apologize to His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI for anything I have said in criticism of him, since it was not until today that I understood what he had did and why he had done it, nor that as Pope he was acting for the good of the Church in the best and only way he could see to do, acting on the  basis of the counsels of Our Lady and Pope John Paul II. — Finally, I entertain the possibility that some Cardinals know of this grand stratagem of Benedict and that is why they act so dumb when asked about the question of validity or invalidity of the resignation.

    FOOTNOTE:

    * The right of election will fall to those Catholics of the Diocese Rome, who recognize that Benedict always was the only true pope, and that Bergoglio was always and is only, and nothing more, an Antipope. See my Disputed Question on Defecting Cardinals, here.[/font][/size]
    "I think that he [Pope Benedict] was pushed... he semi-resigned... he didn't completely resign, he semi-resigned... he made way for another pope to take his place... but he kept, nevertheless, the white habit, he kept various things of the Papacy." - Bishop Williamson


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41859
    • Reputation: +23917/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #1 on: September 12, 2019, 09:24:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Pope Benedict XVI ... has defeated the AntiChurch

    :facepalm:

    Alas, AntiChurch is very much alive and well, and thrived under Benedict as well.


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #2 on: September 12, 2019, 10:04:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    Good cop, bad cop. 

    Now the "traditionalist" B-16 will instruct the SSPXers to do the 1965 mass and everyone will be tickled pink. 
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline David Slays Goliath

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 39
    • Reputation: +30/-22
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #3 on: September 12, 2019, 01:32:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Offline Quo vadis Domine

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4187
    • Reputation: +2431/-557
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #4 on: September 12, 2019, 04:58:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I’m not a fan of TIA, but the following article demonstrates just how orthodox Ratzinger is:

    https://www.traditioninaction.org/RevolutionPhotos/A118rcRatzingerCommunionSchtz.htm
    For what doth it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and suffer the loss of his own soul? Or what exchange shall a man give for his soul?


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41859
    • Reputation: +23917/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #5 on: September 12, 2019, 05:27:31 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • And I have my issues with MHFM ... but ...
    https://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/catholicchurch/anti-pope-benedict-xvi/

    Some of the stuff in his writings and speeches would make Martin Luther's hair stand on end.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10054
    • Reputation: +5252/-916
    • Gender: Female
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #6 on: September 12, 2019, 05:56:04 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Resignationists show just who is far more dangerous here:  Ratzinger.
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1484/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #7 on: September 12, 2019, 06:28:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I have met Br Alexis in person and I’m shocked that he would buy into that nonsense.  He is essentially claiming that Benedict defeated the liberals by lying about his resignation both by using a deceptive formula and then after the fact lying about what he did.  It’s completely irrational gibberish.


    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1484/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #8 on: September 12, 2019, 06:29:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • God will not allow the Church to be saved from liberal persecution by lies.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41859
    • Reputation: +23917/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #9 on: September 12, 2019, 07:31:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I have met Br Alexis in person and I’m shocked that he would buy into that nonsense.  He is essentially claiming that Benedict defeated the liberals by lying about his resignation both by using a deceptive formula and then after the fact lying about what he did.  It’s completely irrational gibberish.

    And it's pure speculation.  He strings this narrative together without a lick of proof that any of this was deliberate deception.

    As Cardinal Kasper (the friendly ecuмenist) stated, there's not a lick of difference theologically between Bergoglio and Ratziner.

    Offline nottambula

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 182
    • Reputation: +70/-82
    • Gender: Female
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #10 on: September 13, 2019, 06:59:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Quote from: Clemens Maria
    He is essentially claiming that Benedict defeated the liberals by lying about his resignation both by using a deceptive formula and then after the fact lying about what he did. God will not allow the Church to be saved from liberal persecution by lies.
     

    In the combox to his article, Br. Bugnolo replied: 

    Quote
    Thanks. I found myself thinking a few days ago, that if it is licit for the Pope to resign then it is lawful that he appear to resign to defend himself or the Church from Her enemies or from his. Thus, though I formerly only considered that a deliberate intention to appear to resign but not resign was gravely immoral, because I saw that it was per se inconsistent with truth, I see that to God’s enemies one is not obliged to tell the truth simply and that just as one can use a mental reservation to save the innocent from capture during war time, so a Pope can use a mental reservation in the way he seems to resign. I do not know the Pope’s intentions, but as a son of Saint Francis, I am bound to see them in the best light. I hope I have done so.


    A similar comment was posted by Fr. Belland on the Non Veni Pacem blog (1/8/2018 ):


    Quote
    That it “looks” like bifurcating, or trying to set up a diarchy, could be because he was dissimulating in order not to resign the Office. For, if he had resigned the Office Satan would then have official control of the Church, which would make a mockery of Christ’s promise to Peter at Caesarea Philippi. It is becoming more and more evident today than it was when Benedict “resigned”, and I firmly believe that it was what was said in the Third Secret that made him realize that he had to retain the Petrine Office. And if this is the case, there is no way that he would intent to bifurcate, or set up a diarchy. It is also why he can say that he was completely free in his resignation; that is, he was told to resign the Papacy, but he didn’t—he freely kept the Petrine Office, and by dissimulating a “shared Papacy” those who did believe in the modern theological teaching of the “Bologna School” could not really complain. It should be noted that in certain situations it is lawful to “dissimulate”, especially during war, and we certainly are in a spiritual war today. But. St. Thomas also defends Christ when, asked by his disciples on the road to Emmaus to stay, he feigned going farther; there was nothing wrong with what Christ did.

    "I think that he [Pope Benedict] was pushed... he semi-resigned... he didn't completely resign, he semi-resigned... he made way for another pope to take his place... but he kept, nevertheless, the white habit, he kept various things of the Papacy." - Bishop Williamson


    Offline Nishant Xavier

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2873
    • Reputation: +1893/-1750
    • Gender: Male
    • Immaculate Heart of Mary, May Your Triumph Come!
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #11 on: September 13, 2019, 07:46:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • It may well be a Mercy from Divine Providence that Pope Benedict XVI is still alive during the Pontificate of Pope Francis - Pope Francis may well need and turn to the guidance of Pope Benedict XVI before the end. The prophesy of Pope St. Pius X said that when Rome falls, the Pope of the same name as his would be killed. Many think that is Pope Benedict XVI's, as his first name Joseph, is the same as Pope St. Pius X's original name, Guiseppe or Joseph Sarto. It's probably only at that time that Pope Francis will recognize some of the mistakes he is making. There's a prophesy of St. Bridget that the Pope who was lax on Clerical Celibacy would lose his soul, unless before death he repents - and it appears that Pope Francis is going to be that Pope, per the Apostate Amazon Synod's heresies; therefore, it may have been a Mercy from God for him that Pope Benedict XVI is still alive, and he will change his mind in the end. Also note that St. Bridget didn't say the Pope would lose his office, but only his soul. Finally, 1Peter5 had an article from Siscoe a while ago, showing that Pope Francis' morally unanimous universal episcopal acceptance is a sufficient indicator he now really governs the Church.

    With regard to some of Pope Benedict XVI's mistakes earlier on, I think he became more genuinely orthodox and traditional as time went on. It was the work of Grace, and shows that persistent prayers for the Pope, as Our Lady commanded at Fatima, are desperately needed and can actually make a tangible difference.
    "We wish also to make amends for the insults to which Your Vicar on earth and Your Priests are everywhere subjected [above all by schismatic sedevacantists - Nishant Xavier], for the profanation, by conscious neglect or Terrible Acts of Sacrilege, of the very Sacrament of Your Divine Love; and lastly for the Public Crimes of Nations who resist the Rights and The Teaching Authority of the Church which You have founded." - Act of Reparation to the Sacred Heart of Lord Jesus.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41859
    • Reputation: +23917/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #12 on: September 13, 2019, 07:59:46 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • What is this nonsense about "mistakes"?  Neither of them has made any mistake.  They are in error, and they need to convert from their errors.  You make it seems like they are accidentally misspeaking.

    And stop trying to derive theological conclusions from your interpretation of dubious anecdotal reports of various prophecies and revelations.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 10304
    • Reputation: +6213/-1742
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #13 on: September 13, 2019, 08:49:23 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    By an invalid resignation Pope Benedict has canonically invalidated everything Bergoglio has done, can do, and can ever do! Bergoglio is now an AntiPope because of the clever trick Benedict played on him. 
    It's one thing to argue that governmental or legal decisions made by +Francis are invalid.  But what about the damage that +Francis has done to millions upon millions of souls, who follow his bad example by accepting the gαy movement, or accepting divorced communions, or accepting that the muslim/Jєωιѕн god is ok?  This writer, and the OP of this thread, both fail to see the loss of souls, the loss of Faith and the loss of catholicity that has occurred under +Francis, and such devastation is IRREVERSIBLE.  Souls have been damned to hell forever, for following +Francis' bad example (though these souls are personally responsible too, I don't want to place all the blame on +Francis), yet this is all ok, because +Benedict is sitting back in his cozy chair, playing the piano, smiling and thinking, "It's all illegal."  Who cares?  That's like the general of a war sending his troops into battle, knowing that the opposing force will surrender the next day regardless.  It's fight that solves nothing, but soldiers die anyway.  What kind of leader does this to his troops?

    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1484/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Re: How Benedict has defeated “Francis”
    « Reply #14 on: September 13, 2019, 03:31:17 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0


  • In the combox to his article, Br. Bugnolo replied:

    Quote
    Quote
    Thanks. I found myself thinking a few days ago, that if it is licit for the Pope to resign then it is lawful that he appear to resign to defend himself or the Church from Her enemies or from his. Thus, though I formerly only considered that a deliberate intention to appear to resign but not resign was gravely immoral, because I saw that it was per se inconsistent with truth, I see that to God’s enemies one is not obliged to tell the truth simply and that just as one can use a mental reservation to save the innocent from capture during war time, so a Pope can use a mental reservation in the way he seems to resign. I do not know the Pope’s intentions, but as a son of Saint Francis, I am bound to see them in the best light. I hope I have done so.
    That's bovine scatology.  B16 would have had to deceive the whole world including Catholics whom it is supposed that he was duty-bound to protect.  Yes, Br Alexis should have recognized that B16 would have been committing a mortal sin in deceiving his flock.  You and XavierSem should be ashamed for supporting such nonsense.  Did the devil whisper this idea into your ear?  Why would you think that God would protect His Church via lies?  It is blasphemous.