Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Home - Aloneism  (Read 466 times)

1 Member and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Home - Aloneism
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 10:32:15 PM »
I'm a home-aloner and I don't see a problem with it. Of course I would never try to convince anybody to be one. It just works well for me.

Not sure how a Catholic can have "no problem" with it, to be without the Mass and the Sacraments.  While I can understand accepting it and offering it up, to say you have "no problem with it" ... I think there's something out of whack with your spirituality.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Home - Aloneism
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 10:35:20 PM »
be careful about encouraging people to put their faith in danger by frequenting the modernists.

Is your faith so pathetically weak that if you hear one snide remark from the pulpit at an SSPX chapel against the Resistance that it would endanger your faith?  Seriously?

Get a grip, man ... and dispense with the hyperbole.  Other than listening to a Father Paul Robinson deny the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture, I've never heard anything from the pulpit at an SSPX chapel that would "endanger [my] faith".  Same goes for FSSP ... though with them the problem would be with doubtful Sacraments ... and SSPX are bringing more and more of those along also.  But given a valid priest who's not Father Paul Robinson, there's no danger to your faith unless you're some extraordinarily pathetic weakling.


Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: Home - Aloneism
« Reply #7 on: Today at 05:02:20 AM »
I'm a home-aloner and I don't see a problem with it. Of course I would never try to convince anybody to be one. It just works well for me.
I've heard that HAers should be compared to those who've been excommunicated, which are those who the Church has separated from the community of the faithful due to their public sin(s) which She does for the good of the rest of the community of faithful. If there is a Mass and sacraments you can get to, you go there, it is required.

Whether you think so or not, the Church deems it expedient for the good of the Church and our faith to physically be a part of the community of faithful, even if, as it says in Scripture, there are only two or three others, you need to be one of them.     

Re: Home - Aloneism
« Reply #8 on: Today at 10:46:42 AM »
Is your faith so pathetically weak that if you hear one snide remark from the pulpit at an SSPX chapel against the Resistance that it would endanger your faith?  Seriously?

Get a grip, man ... and dispense with the hyperbole.  Other than listening to a Father Paul Robinson deny the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture, I've never heard anything from the pulpit at an SSPX chapel that would "endanger [my] faith".  Same goes for FSSP ... though with them the problem would be with doubtful Sacraments ... and SSPX are bringing more and more of those along also.  But given a valid priest who's not Father Paul Robinson, there's no danger to your faith unless you're some extraordinarily pathetic weakling.
How exactly did Fr. Paul Robinson deny the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture? I'm a sede who used to be Resistance but I'm not particularly familiar with his case. I know he has some more liberal views on Creationism and the like, but how exactly did he do that? Did you really hear it at the pulpit, and what was it like? I'm not sure if Old Earth goes against Church Teaching, I'd have to go through the evidence.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Home - Aloneism
« Reply #9 on: Today at 01:42:57 PM »
How exactly did Fr. Paul Robinson deny the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture? I'm a sede who used to be Resistance but I'm not particularly familiar with his case. I know he has some more liberal views on Creationism and the like, but how exactly did he do that? Did you really hear it at the pulpit, and what was it like? I'm not sure if Old Earth goes against Church Teaching, I'd have to go through the evidence.
He wrote a book, supporting "theistic" evolution (his version of it) which denies all sorts of Scriptural passages and goes against most of what the Church Fathers taught on the topic.  St Augustine and other allowed a certain leeway to understand certain passages.  Fr went totally beyond this leeway into critical error territory.