The reader will note. I said: "First, you have no proof that I am Xavier. It's simply your opinion." which Ladislaus DISHONESTLY summarizes as: "He simply says "... I am Xavier".
First you (1) answer the question I asked of you. Can you be honest enough to admit (2) the New Catechism (3) and this Vatican initiative correctly promotes Evangelization, in accord with traditional Catholic teaching? If you can't, I won't even bother replying to you.
When I Google Xavier Nishant, I get links to a One Peter Five article. That has nothing to do with the topic of this thread. Try answering it you can, or remain silent if you cannot. Bye.
So, your issues with reading comprehension add another data point ... along with yet another non-denial.
Please re-read what I wrote. I said, a poster who is not Xavier Sem / Nishant would not answer "[no proof that] I am Xavier", but would instead say something like "[no proof that] I am THIS Xaver [you speak of]", or else, "Who is THIS Xavier?"
Then you add another diversion: "When I Google Xavier Nishant, I get links to a One Peter Five article."
He could have simply avoided wasting all this time by saying .. "No, I'm not this Xavier / Xavier Sem / Xavier Nishant that you speak of ..."
But he won't because he can't, not without lying, and he prides himself on being the Messiah to India.
When I Google Xavier Nishant, I get this ... (no surpise with the fradulent "Divine Mercy" devotion)
