They’ll want to take their foot off the gas for a couple years, with another BXVI rerun to consolidate their gains before the next lurch forward with Muller’s successor.

Look for more collaboration/compromise from the SSPX, which will be easier to sell during this faux conservative period.

Well, perhaps the next false pope.  

They’ll want to take their foot off the gas for a couple years, with another BXVI rerun to consolidate their gains before the next lurch forward with Muller’s successor.

Look for more collaboration/compromise from the SSPX, which will be easier to sell during this faux conservative period.

Hard to say.  It depends on how much "time" they think they have left before God restores the Church.

That article is from 2016, did something happen recently to bring attention back to this article or did you just discover it? As I do not remember reading this article either, so thanks for finding it.

Would we prefer a Pope like this, or a Pope like Tagle, Hollerich, or Fernandez?

Sedevacantists, of course, might reply that it doesn't matter.

Of course it matters. The worse the antipope, the better. Bergoglio was the best sede preacher of all time. Although some have their heads so deep in the sand that even if the next antipope offers human sacrifice to satan they'd still be waiting for a council to depose him.

Unfortunately, I think Muller has a great shot at being elected to consolidate the new normal and throw real Catholicism out the Overton window, replacing it with "I like tradition and don't like sodomy."

That article is from 2016, did something happen recently to bring attention back to this article

Yes:

Muller is getting lots of media attention from the indult crowd lately (eg., see Michael Matt’s Remnant website, and CIC conference), with his comments on the dead-end dubia, criticism of Francis, being invited to the Synod of Satan as a counterbalancing (but still conciliar) voice.

I pulled this article because it shows what he (like BXVI) really intends for Tradition.

But there won’t be two wild-eyed modernists like Francis elected back to back.

They need Muller/Ratzinger types to sell it to the skeptics.

After Pius XII, you had Roncalli.

After Paul VI, you had JPII the Great

After BXVI, you had Francis.

In other words, two steps forward, one step, eh, well, forward.  But alternating between the two, both always heading in the same direction.

Muller is on deck.

In other words, two steps forward, one step, eh, well, forward.  But alternating between the two, both always heading in the same direction.

Yes, it's their Hegelian dialectic to keep shifting perception of what is "Traditional".  People would hail Mueller's "papacy" as a new Springtime of the Church after the Bergoglio disaster, but Mueller is about is orthodox as Wojtyla and Ratzinger.

This is possible, but it depends on whether they feel the destruction needs to be accelerated (if they feel that time is growing short).  So, to me, it would depend on how long Bergoglio lasts.  I personally believe that they have until about 2029.