Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 45

Author Topic: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI  (Read 42842 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Jupiter

Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #140 on: January 30, 2022, 01:03:45 PM »
Quote from: gladius_veritatis on January 30, 2022, 01:01:30 PM
:laugh2:  In the real world this is called a Jackass Response.  Jupiter: another pseudo-intellectual tool-bag.

This is how I speak in the “real world” as well. I don’t see the problem here aside from my rash assumption that 2Vermont was not well read on the topic she is writing about. Furthermore, I make no pretensions to being an intellectual. Reading books and docuмents does not make one an intellectual.
Logged

Offline 2Vermont

Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #141 on: January 30, 2022, 01:09:17 PM »
Jupiter, what sedevacantist group do you align with?  Where do you assist at mass ... not actual location, but group....? Or do you stay home?  Because I have never known a sedevacantist to hold the views you hold regarding Vatican II.
Logged

Offline Jupiter

Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #142 on: January 30, 2022, 01:14:44 PM »
Quote from: 2Vermont on January 30, 2022, 01:09:17 PM
Jupiter, what sedevacantist group do you align with?  Where do you assist at mass ... not actual location, but group....? Or do you stay home?  Because I have never known a sedevacantist to hold the views you hold regarding Vatican II.

I hold to the Cassiciacuм Thesis as the best explanation for the ecclesiastical question. However, due to my views on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and Communicatio in Sacris, I am not able to attend Mass at any chapel so I am a “home aloner” as some people would describe it.

P.S.

I’ve seen your comments occasionally on NOW (presuming you are the same 2Vermont). Good to meet you, madame and kindly excuse my insensitive response above. I am often brutish and that is most inappropriate in the presence of the fairer side of our species.
Logged

Offline DigitalLogos

Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #143 on: January 30, 2022, 01:16:27 PM »
Quote from: Jupiter on January 30, 2022, 01:14:44 PM
I hold to the Cassiciacuм Thesis as the best explanation for the ecclesiastical question. However, due to my views on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and Communicatio in Sacris, I am not able to attend Mass at any chapel so I am a “home aloner” as some people would describe it.
So because of your extreme interpretation and application of the two, you cut yourself off from otherwise valid sacraments? I would say that's imprudent.
Logged

Offline Jupiter

Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #144 on: January 30, 2022, 01:28:05 PM »
Quote from: DigitalLogos on January 30, 2022, 01:16:27 PM
So because of your extreme interpretation and application of the two, you cut yourself off from otherwise valid sacraments? I would say that's imprudent.

Yes. The sacraments are indeed valid, but the Sedevacantist priests dispensing them are heretics for rejecting dogmas, nay even waging war on dogmas, of the Church. Bishop Sanborn’s views on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus and Natural Family Planning makes his group an impossible choice for me otherwise I am most well disposed to his group’s otherwise phenomenal work. They are especially to be commended on their correct understanding of Communicatio in Sacris and their torch bearing of the late Bishop Guerard des Lauriers’ Cassiciacuм Thesis.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29] 30 31 ... 45
« previous next »