Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI  (Read 24244 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Anne Evergreen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 702
  • Reputation: +295/-727
  • Gender: Female
Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #120 on: January 29, 2022, 02:47:51 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!3
  • I believe that the last pope died in 1989 (about 33 years ago).
    Oh dear God, help me, please. How many people are claiming to be Pope? :confused: What is the name of this supposed pope that died about 33 years ago? Was he in Rome?

    Are you part of the Schuckardt (sp?) crowd in Spokane, WA?

    Are you part of the group in Kansas that has their own "Pope?" (The guy in his basement--I think he called or calls himself "Pope Michael?"

    Are you part of the Old Catholic cult?

    Are you in the Palmar De Troya crowd?

    Are you part of the group in Quebec that has now branched off into the US, but they claim their own "Pope?"

    Are you part of the sub-group of Little Pebble cult--that goes along with
    something else?

    I have had friends mixed-up with all of these groups, except the first one of the 33 years ago "Pope." That's a new one for me.
    Sorry, but I cannot wrap my head around this Lad. I cannot.

    I have done my best to understand where you are coming from, but I don't think there is much hope for that.

    You are telling me that I need new Priests? I don't think so. I think they are the only ones keeping me from going off the deep end into leaving the Catholic Church and following the church of anyone that sets themselves up to be Pope just because they are convinced they are the ones with the "correct answer."

    Edit in: This leaves me with SSPX and FSSP. There is no way I am wandering down the path of "there is no Pope." NOPE, not gonna do it. Nor am I going to get caught up in "independent" chapels so quickly, for this same reason.

    God help us all. 

    Offline Jupiter

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 99
    • Reputation: +56/-90
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #121 on: January 29, 2022, 02:57:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Oh dear God, help me, please. How many people are claiming to be Pope? :confused: What is the name of this supposed pope that died about 33 years ago? Was he in Rome?

    Are you part of the Schuckardt (sp?) crowd in Spokane, WA?

    Are you part of the group in Kansas that has their own "Pope?" (The guy in his basement--I think he called or calls himself "Pope Michael?"

    Are you part of the Old Catholic cult?

    Are you in the Palmar De Troya crowd?

    Are you part of the group in Quebec that has now branched off into the US, but they claim their own "Pope?"

    Are you part of the sub-group of Little Pebble cult--that goes along with
    something else?

    I have had friends mixed-up with all of these groups, except the first one of the 33 years ago "Pope." That's a new one for me.
    Sorry, but I cannot wrap my head around this Lad. I cannot.

    I have done my best to understand where you are coming from, but I don't think there is much hope for that.

    You are telling me that I need new Priests? I don't think so. I think they are the only ones keeping me from going off the deep end into leaving the Catholic Church and following the church of anyone that sets themselves up to be Pope just because they are convinced they are the ones with the "correct answer."


    Ladislaus was referring to the Cardinal Siri thesis. It is a false theory for many reasons which go beyond what I care to discuss in this thread, but you can read about it here:

    http://www.thepopeinred.com


    Offline Anne Evergreen

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 702
    • Reputation: +295/-727
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #122 on: January 29, 2022, 03:13:51 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!3

  • Ladislaus was referring to the Cardinal Siri thesis. It is a false theory for many reasons which go beyond what I care to discuss in this thread, but you can read about it here:

    http://www.thepopeinred.com
    Hi, you must be new here? Welcome, if so. Cool name, btw, and now I have "drops of Jupiter" running through my head, lol. Anyway...good luck here, you will need it. There are lots of people here that have beliefs way beyond my Baltimore and Penny Catechisms. They make no sense to me whatsoever, and maybe might explain why so many Traditional Catholics that I have met over the years have ended up having complete and total mental breakdowns. That, or they end up losing their Faith entirely, or both.

    I appreciate the link. I have never heard of that, and I will read it on a day when I can handle it. My stress level is beyond the snapping point, and today is not that day.

    Aye carumba. Pope in red, okay, well that's a new color even. Yikes. All we need is the Pope in blue and it's an American trifecta. :facepalm:

    Good luck and God bless---this stuff is just mind-boggling.

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4717/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #123 on: January 29, 2022, 03:23:23 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • Anne, I thought you hated social media and especially this place? Why are you back? I thought you had a learning disability, why even look at a debate about the Pope question?


    Quote
    I may or may not be back during or after my recovery. I am fed up with this place and I now HATE SOCIAL MEDIA, including forums like this. I cannot compete with people that are more tech-savy than I am to figure it all out, and it keeps getting more and more complicated, not easier.

    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Offline Carissima

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 782
    • Reputation: +569/-229
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #124 on: January 29, 2022, 03:40:24 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Anne, I thought you hated social media and especially this place? Why are you back? I thought you had a learning disability, why even look at a debate about the Pope question?
    Because Anne said she came here as penance, remember? She has to help the poor, stupid misinformed trads by mocking and insulting them constantly..it is the only way to awaken them from their errors


    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1485/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #125 on: January 29, 2022, 05:20:39 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • Also, nice that he needs to cite Bp. Sanborn's other novelty: "opinionism". Condemning any and all theological opinions that go against the party line of his sedevacantist group.
    But isn't that the whole point of Heiner's editorial?  I haven't read the whole thread yet so maybe someone else has already said this but the only new thing about this editorial is the condemnation of CMRI, not because their Masses are una cuм but because their clergy don't bar una cuм people from the sacraments.  I go to a CMRI church so I know that they don't recommend una cuм Masses.  They just don't punish those who do go to una cuм Masses.  So if we compare it to the St Hypatius vs Nestorius event, Bishop Sanborn would not only break communion with Nestorius the heretic but also with Eulalius who failed to break communion with Nestorius until a decision from Rome.  And now it seems that maybe Bishop Sanborn would break communion with St Hypatius too!  For not condemning Eulalius as well.  Bishop Sanborn is going off the rails.  Sad to see it.  I hope they will reconsider.

    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4960
    • Reputation: +1924/-387
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #126 on: January 29, 2022, 05:49:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Anne: as long as anyone who claims to be a follower of Christ, says the adulterated New Order not mass, they are known by their fruits as heretics, enemies of the Church that Christ founded. This is Matthew 24 "abomination desolation" then Christ refers to Daniel prophet, the continual sacrifice of the Mass will come to an end, or nearly.  

    No tribunal is necessary, know them by their outward fruits.  All those who say this adulterated mass are excommunicated.  They excommunicated themselves, removed themselves by their own free will.  

    I will not follow their ways, and I can not say that I am in communion with them.  They are prayed for as enemies of Christ's Church.

    Offline Clemens Maria

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2246
    • Reputation: +1485/-605
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #127 on: January 29, 2022, 09:00:55 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Never fear.  Jupiter is here.
    Yes, I laughed when a friend referred to Heiner as Pope Heiner.


    Offline Anne Evergreen

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 702
    • Reputation: +295/-727
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #128 on: January 30, 2022, 01:32:51 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Anne, I thought you hated social media and especially this place? Why are you back? I thought you had a learning disability, why even look at a debate about the Pope question?
    I do. There is no place to go read Catholic articles and things without the stupid comment sections!!

    It doesn't matter if it's Church Militant, Life Site, Catholic News Agency, From Rome, GAB, Twitter, CI here, and a whole bunch of other websites that I have looked at with supposedly Catholic threads/pages/content. I have been looking off and on for 2 years now, and each of these places has their own group of regular posters that comment on different things. 

    I have been noticing that there is NO Catholic site free from: Priest bashing, Pope bashing, name-calling, criticizing people, and so-on. There are definite themes happening.

    This place, I thought while lurking, would be one of the better places to join in to help ease some of the isolation. But once I joined? I quickly realized that it was actually not so great. In fact, it is probably the WORST, if I had to rank them all, based on what I have read--and I am only a member here and nowhere else.

    I underestimated how many people here actually are Sedevacantists. They either come right out and say it, or they dig/poke me, and not-so-subtly, but the long and the short of it is, they are vicious about it. They don't like me because I am not one of them. I have tried to figure out a few things, but at the end of the day, Sedevacantists make no sense to me, and that is why I get attacked so much. Do I get angry? YES. It's usually because I have been attacked so much for either not being in their "club" or "group," or because I have honestly tried to keep up with many of the threads here and I cannot.

    Why am I back again? Duh, obviously I am a sucker for punishment, or determined, or both, and plus, I keep getting mail. One of these days I will be able to figure out my thoughts to reply to those inbox messages here, but yes, I do have a learning disability, and that's not going away. Part of it affects my ability to focus and concentrate, so I get distracted easily sometimes. The more people that jump on me at once, the worse it gets, and the more frustrated I get. 

    Actually, when I got on this topic, I didn't realize it was a Pope thread exactly. But a couple of people suggested that I read more, and I laughed, but then I figured that I would just get out my missal and go from there.

    So here you go: In my missal, In the Prayers before the Consecration, the opening prayer in the Canon of the Mass is the Te Igitur. Near the bottom of that prayer is where the prayer for the Pope comes in: "Una cuм..."

    Me and my understanding and the Masses I attend: Insert name of Pope Francis and Bishop in charge of area.
    Possible Sedevacantist: Skip that whole part, insert name of deceased Pope, insert name of living "Pope" of some group, insert name of some Bishop of choice or in charge of group. I don't know what other possible scenarios that I can think of, but anyway...

    Good Friday: The Great Intercessions: PUBLIC PRAYERS. 
    1) For Holy Church
    2) For the Supreme Pontiff
    3) For all Orders and Grades of the Faithful
    4) For those Engaged in Public Affairs
    5) For Catechumens
    6) For the Needs of the Faithful
    7) For Heretics and Schismatics
    8) For Conversion of the Jews
    9) For Conversion of Unbelievers

    If a person is a Sede vacantist, then they would skip 2, or else somehow add in some name of some other supposed living "Pope" or I don't know, pick an old one that has died?

    If they skip it, then do they add in Pope Francis into 7 and 9, or just 7?

    So not only do I not belong, but I don't even follow the same missal. Or if we share the same missal, then Priests are just making up their own Mass stuff for the Canon, or altering it, and the same goes for Good Friday.

    So if this is going on, then how are Sede Vacantists any different that SOME "innovative" Novus Ordo Priests that add or alter Parts of the Mass? They aren't if you ask me.

    So now here's Anne finding herself on this website where it seems there are exponentially more Sede Vacantists openly claiming it, or else if not openly claiming it, holding that view and somehow going to a Mass where the Pope is still prayed for?

    WEIRD. It makes NO sense to me. If you have no Pope, then you have no visible head of the Church. If you make stuff up or alter it in the Canon of the Mass, then I would say that Mass is not valid.

    So I don't fit in here because I believe Pope Francis is the Pope, and there's not much that I can do about it, except continue to pray God's will be done, and to pray for Pope Francis.

    So actually, the advice that I think it was Meg gave, and Nadir earlier, a long time ago, was to read more, and post less or something, that was Nadir, I think. I don't know exactly but I think it was those two ladies. Anyway, I just picked up missal and it's all there. It's not hard to figure out if I keep it simple like I do. If I try to complicate things, or read some heavy-duty obscure stuff, it makes me MORE confused, and not less, and I get more frustrated and the likes. 

    And here, when people gang up on one person? It's basically like psychological gang-rape, believe it or not. If people are not actively partaking, then there are many others on the sidelines cheering/egging on. 

    It's the same disgusting situation when there is a person on a bridge and they are considering jumping to end their life. Cars driving by or people walking by will egg the person on by yelling, "Jump!" It's no different. The principle is the same. That's why they always shut down bridges and call them "Police Incidents." They don't want the person to be bullied or peer-pressured into jumping.

    Here then, I am really NOT amongst my "peers" if you will. I am like the jumper on the bridge, and people are pretty much telling me, with few exceptions to jump. "We hate your guts, Anne, JUMP!" "We hate your guts, Anne, don't come back!" "We are better than you, Anne!" "You SUCK, Anne!"


    I see no difference. I found myself amongst a bunch of losers doing exactly this, and I found myself turning and doing some of the same things to retaliate at times towards others. It's awful, wrong, and I don't want to be like that! This place has brought out the WORST in me, and so I took some steps back to figure out why, where it happened, and how, and what to do about it, (if I could do anything), etc.

    I came to the conclusion that it is very unlikely that I will change anyone's opinions of many things here, because there are so many people and so many topics that the exponential numbers of possibilities is more math than my brain can handle. But what I CAN DO, is return to being the person that usually helps the jumper off the bridge, instead of finding myself caught up in a group where too many people think it's okay to tell someone to jump. In this case, me.

    That's kind of the best comparison I can come up with in my head. And if this site is bad for the things that I have mentioned, then that's more scary still, because 1) Everyone here is supposed to be Catholic and 2), There are no other sites left for me to go where I won't run into this same kind of stuff I already listed above with the Priest bashing, name-calling, fighting, and so on.

    It's very sad. The pressure of group think is enormous, and the pressure to "outcast" or shun those that don't conform is also enormous. I am usually the only one going against a group or a crowd, so-to-speak in many cases, and when I got here, I found myself getting into group attack mode, and that's not right. Not at all.

    There are Resistance People here, but I am finding out there are issues there, too, and some of them are actually kind of similar to the Sede Vacantists. The way I understand it in my brain, is that the Resistance is one step away from being Sede Vacantist, to keep it simple. So that in itself, also has me wondering what other dangers are lurking if I try to explore that further.

    When I said to you the other day about going around and around on your hamster wheels? It's true, because I couldn't see how any of the Sede Vacantist stuff made sense, or how people can go to Good Friday and not pray for the Supreme Pontiff, etc. 

    To me, you have to be Inside the Catholic Church, and I just don't see how that is possible as a Sede Vacantist. I am no theologian or anything, or Priest, and my Catechism was interrupted and I only had spits and spats mostly, but I listen to the Sermons and read simple Saints Stories and articles that are things I can put down and take up again later. Here? This is more like rapid-response, or else the number of people gets prohibitive, and I can't respond to hundreds of people. I have done my very best to reply to those that have been patient and kind enough to put up with me, or to answer back to threads.

    God bless, Anne.

    P.S. It makes a lot more sense now, too, if people have been here awhile, they have also probably held their views as long. If a new person comes along, there will be pressure put on that new person to slot themselves into a BOX, or else be slotted into one or more BOXES. There is more likelihood that the group will pressure to conform.


    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8032
    • Reputation: +2466/-1108
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #129 on: January 30, 2022, 07:10:22 AM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!1
  • I have been noticing that there is NO Catholic site free from: Priest bashing, Pope bashing, name-calling, criticizing people, and so-on. There are definite themes happening.

    I am under no illusion that this will be received in the same, kind spirit with which I write.  So be it.  I pray that it is.

    Your response seems to reveal that you might be wiser to learn a good deal more about the different responses to the unprecedented crisis regarding Holy Church if you desire to wisely and profitably contribute to specific discussions.  It is always helpful to understand one's opponents, if you will, as thoroughly as possible.

    You might also refrain from being surprised (dare I say feigning surprise?) that most human beings are somewhat-less-than perfect.  Your skin seems rather thin at times, which can also make life around here (or anywhere and everywhere in this world) uncomfortable.

    I know, the problem is everyone else; it always is, ins't it?  [FWIW, a good many priests in these evil days absolutely deserve to be bashed and worse.  We are not in this situation because modern clerics are doing a wonderful job.]
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2312
    • Reputation: +867/-144
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #130 on: January 30, 2022, 08:17:52 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1

  • I do. There is no place to go read Catholic articles and things without the stupid comment sections!!

    It doesn't matter if it's Church Militant, Life Site, Catholic News Agency, From Rome, GAB, Twitter, CI here, and a whole bunch of other websites that I have looked at with supposedly Catholic threads/pages/content. I have been looking off and on for 2 years now, and each of these places has their own group of regular posters that comment on different things.

    I have been noticing that there is NO Catholic site free from: Priest bashing, Pope bashing, name-calling, criticizing people, and so-on. There are definite themes happening.

    This place, I thought while lurking, would be one of the better places to join in to help ease some of the isolation. But once I joined? I quickly realized that it was actually not so great. In fact, it is probably the WORST, if I had to rank them all, based on what I have read--and I am only a member here and nowhere else.

    I underestimated how many people here actually are Sedevacantists. They either come right out and say it, or they dig/poke me, and not-so-subtly, but the long and the short of it is, they are vicious about it. They don't like me because I am not one of them. I have tried to figure out a few things, but at the end of the day, Sedevacantists make no sense to me, and that is why I get attacked so much. Do I get angry? YES. It's usually because I have been attacked so much for either not being in their "club" or "group," or because I have honestly tried to keep up with many of the threads here and I cannot.

    Why am I back again? Duh, obviously I am a sucker for punishment, or determined, or both, and plus, I keep getting mail. One of these days I will be able to figure out my thoughts to reply to those inbox messages here, but yes, I do have a learning disability, and that's not going away. Part of it affects my ability to focus and concentrate, so I get distracted easily sometimes. The more people that jump on me at once, the worse it gets, and the more frustrated I get.

    Actually, when I got on this topic, I didn't realize it was a Pope thread exactly. But a couple of people suggested that I read more, and I laughed, but then I figured that I would just get out my missal and go from there.

    So here you go: In my missal, In the Prayers before the Consecration, the opening prayer in the Canon of the Mass is the Te Igitur. Near the bottom of that prayer is where the prayer for the Pope comes in: "Una cuм..."

    Me and my understanding and the Masses I attend: Insert name of Pope Francis and Bishop in charge of area.
    Possible Sedevacantist: Skip that whole part, insert name of deceased Pope, insert name of living "Pope" of some group, insert name of some Bishop of choice or in charge of group. I don't know what other possible scenarios that I can think of, but anyway...

    Good Friday: The Great Intercessions: PUBLIC PRAYERS.
    1) For Holy Church
    2) For the Supreme Pontiff
    3) For all Orders and Grades of the Faithful
    4) For those Engaged in Public Affairs
    5) For Catechumens
    6) For the Needs of the Faithful
    7) For Heretics and Schismatics
    8) For Conversion of the Jєωs
    9) For Conversion of Unbelievers

    If a person is a Sede vacantist, then they would skip 2, or else somehow add in some name of some other supposed living "Pope" or I don't know, pick an old one that has died?

    If they skip it, then do they add in Pope Francis into 7 and 9, or just 7?

    So not only do I not belong, but I don't even follow the same missal. Or if we share the same missal, then Priests are just making up their own Mass stuff for the Canon, or altering it, and the same goes for Good Friday.

    So if this is going on, then how are Sede Vacantists any different that SOME "innovative" Novus Ordo Priests that add or alter Parts of the Mass? They aren't if you ask me.

    So now here's Anne finding herself on this website where it seems there are exponentially more Sede Vacantists openly claiming it, or else if not openly claiming it, holding that view and somehow going to a Mass where the Pope is still prayed for?

    WEIRD. It makes NO sense to me. If you have no Pope, then you have no visible head of the Church. If you make stuff up or alter it in the Canon of the Mass, then I would say that Mass is not valid.

    So I don't fit in here because I believe Pope Francis is the Pope, and there's not much that I can do about it, except continue to pray God's will be done, and to pray for Pope Francis.

    So actually, the advice that I think it was Meg gave, and Nadir earlier, a long time ago, was to read more, and post less or something, that was Nadir, I think. I don't know exactly but I think it was those two ladies. Anyway, I just picked up missal and it's all there. It's not hard to figure out if I keep it simple like I do. If I try to complicate things, or read some heavy-duty obscure stuff, it makes me MORE confused, and not less, and I get more frustrated and the likes.

    And here, when people gang up on one person? It's basically like psychological gang-rape, believe it or not. If people are not actively partaking, then there are many others on the sidelines cheering/egging on.

    It's the same disgusting situation when there is a person on a bridge and they are considering jumping to end their life. Cars driving by or people walking by will egg the person on by yelling, "Jump!" It's no different. The principle is the same. That's why they always shut down bridges and call them "Police Incidents." They don't want the person to be bullied or peer-pressured into jumping.

    Here then, I am really NOT amongst my "peers" if you will. I am like the jumper on the bridge, and people are pretty much telling me, with few exceptions to jump. "We hate your guts, Anne, JUMP!" "We hate your guts, Anne, don't come back!" "We are better than you, Anne!" "You SUCK, Anne!"


    I see no difference. I found myself amongst a bunch of losers doing exactly this, and I found myself turning and doing some of the same things to retaliate at times towards others. It's awful, wrong, and I don't want to be like that! This place has brought out the WORST in me, and so I took some steps back to figure out why, where it happened, and how, and what to do about it, (if I could do anything), etc.

    I came to the conclusion that it is very unlikely that I will change anyone's opinions of many things here, because there are so many people and so many topics that the exponential numbers of possibilities is more math than my brain can handle. But what I CAN DO, is return to being the person that usually helps the jumper off the bridge, instead of finding myself caught up in a group where too many people think it's okay to tell someone to jump. In this case, me.

    That's kind of the best comparison I can come up with in my head. And if this site is bad for the things that I have mentioned, then that's more scary still, because 1) Everyone here is supposed to be Catholic and 2), There are no other sites left for me to go where I won't run into this same kind of stuff I already listed above with the Priest bashing, name-calling, fighting, and so on.

    It's very sad. The pressure of group think is enormous, and the pressure to "outcast" or shun those that don't conform is also enormous. I am usually the only one going against a group or a crowd, so-to-speak in many cases, and when I got here, I found myself getting into group attack mode, and that's not right. Not at all.

    There are Resistance People here, but I am finding out there are issues there, too, and some of them are actually kind of similar to the Sede Vacantists. The way I understand it in my brain, is that the Resistance is one step away from being Sede Vacantist, to keep it simple. So that in itself, also has me wondering what other dangers are lurking if I try to explore that further.

    When I said to you the other day about going around and around on your hamster wheels? It's true, because I couldn't see how any of the Sede Vacantist stuff made sense, or how people can go to Good Friday and not pray for the Supreme Pontiff, etc.

    To me, you have to be Inside the Catholic Church, and I just don't see how that is possible as a Sede Vacantist. I am no theologian or anything, or Priest, and my Catechism was interrupted and I only had spits and spats mostly, but I listen to the Sermons and read simple Saints Stories and articles that are things I can put down and take up again later. Here? This is more like rapid-response, or else the number of people gets prohibitive, and I can't respond to hundreds of people. I have done my very best to reply to those that have been patient and kind enough to put up with me, or to answer back to threads.

    God bless, Anne.

    P.S. It makes a lot more sense now, too, if people have been here awhile, they have also probably held their views as long. If a new person comes along, there will be pressure put on that new person to slot themselves into a BOX, or else be slotted into one or more BOXES. There is more likelihood that the group will pressure to conform.

    Anne,

    I agree with you in the sense that the truth is very simple, and merely takes eyes that can see. The paradox is that, while the truth is in broad daylight and in our faces as it were, it takes a special gift and granting of grace to see it: thus the Jews of Christ's day were rightly judged for not seeing Him, since he spoke to them and did miracles before them, but yet it took a special revelation from God to see Him (as granted Peter, Matthew 16:17).

    It is made complicated because the simple truth is disturbing, inconvenient, and thus the natural man cries out and goes to great efforts to evade or deny it, and engages his brain mightily in the effort. Of course, the brain should be engaged mightily, and the simple truth makes perfect sense. 

    Things have happened since the death of Pius XII that can't be compared to what has happened before since the spread of the Gospel and the establishment of the Church, and which were fated to happen only once, as the ultimate sign of the ultimate end. 


    Quote
    Matthew 24:16-22

    And this gospel of the kingdom, shall be preached in the whole world, for a testimony to all nations, and then shall the consummation come. When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place: he that readeth let him understand.
    Then they that are in Judea, let them flee to the mountains: And he that is on the housetop, let him not come down to take any thing out of his house: And he that is in the field, let him not go back to take his coat. [19] And woe to them that are with child, and that give suck in those days. But pray that your flight be not in the winter, or on the sabbath. For there shall be then great tribulation, such as hath not been from the beginning of the world until now, neither shall be.  And unless those days had been shortened, no flesh should be saved: but for the sake of the elect those days shall be shortened.


    God give you knowledge and peace,

    DR


    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11309
    • Reputation: +6285/-1087
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #131 on: January 30, 2022, 08:21:14 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • “Protestantism” preceded the Council of Trent and claimed that the RC Church was corrupt and taught new doctrines prior to Trent. This is demonstrably false. All of the doctrines taught in the Medieval period as well as at the time of Trent can be shown to have direct continuity with the Early Church.

    Secondly, Vatican II is not the problem. This council can be interpreted in light of Tradition. But it’s not interpreted in light of Tradition and has not been for the past ~60 years. There is clear discontinuity in interpretation and teaching by the post Vatican II magisterium.

    Where was the RCC during the Arian crisis? The Great Western Schism? With its four marks and visibility?
    Given other comments by Jupiter, I found this comment surprising.  I'm not sure I understand his "position". On the one hand he says there hasn't been a pope since Pius XII, but then he says V2 is Catholic.

    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2312
    • Reputation: +867/-144
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #132 on: January 30, 2022, 08:29:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Given other comments by Jupiter, I found this comment surprising.  I'm not sure I understand his "position". On the one hand he says there hasn't been a pope since Pius XII, but then he says V2 is Catholic.

    Though they are not true shepherds, they enter the same sheepfold:


    Quote
    John 10:1   Amen, amen I say to you: He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber.

    I believe Jupiter is talking about the sheepfold, and the false shepherd who nonetheless is identifiable as shepherd (though it's a masquerade in a real sense - hence the conclusion of the Sedes) of the one sheepfold. 

    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11309
    • Reputation: +6285/-1087
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #133 on: January 30, 2022, 08:35:02 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Though they are not true shepherds, they enter the same sheepfold:


    I believe Jupiter is talking about the sheepfold, and the false shepherd who nonetheless is identifiable as shepherd (though it's a masquerade in a real sense - hence the conclusion of the Sedes) of the one sheepfold.

    It seems to me that he thinks they are not true shepherds because they are not interpreting and teaching Vatican II as they should have.  He would believe a post Vatican II pope would be valid and legit if only he were to teach Vatican II the way it "should be" taught. 

    I would think that every poster here, sede and non-sede, would strongly disagree with that position...unless of course they believe Vatican II is Catholic too.

    Offline Jupiter

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 99
    • Reputation: +56/-90
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
    « Reply #134 on: January 30, 2022, 08:41:39 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I do not think that Vatican II is a valid ecuмenical council of the Roman Catholic Church.

    That being said, as I mentioned in my response to RomanTheo, the primary issue of our current crisis is not Vatican II. This council can be interpreted in a way, commensurate to the machinations that gave birth to it, that is in continuity with Tradition due to the very ambiguous nature of its docuмents which were engineered to create weaponized nebulosity.

    The primary issue, rather, is that the post Vatican II “Popes,” ecclesiastical hierarchy, theologians, monastic orders, and the vast majority of the laity have apostatized completely from the Catholic faith.