It's funny how over the decades since V2, the same old arguments, questions, opinions etc., keep coming up over and over again - as if the discovery or statements that some want to make are original, and/or have not already been addressed or hashed over a million times in the last 60 years.
From, Who Shall Ascend?, published in 1992.....
"....The divisive aberration of Sedevacantism is due to nothing else
than certain priests' losing sight of their proper roles in our present
malaise. To save the Church from an heretical pope was never their
assignment. Securing the Apostolic succession of the Church was
never their assignment. What was their assignment? It was to take
care of the people whom God sent them as best they could, say their
prayers faithfully, study and pray that they might not themselves fall
victim to the spirit of Liberalism and worldliness, and keep their torment
and speculations to themselves. The hierarchical structure of the
Church and the papacy are not their business. Such high matters are
the province of none other than Christ Himself and His Mother and
the Apostles.
What happened? Certain priests, having concluded that Pope
John Paul II was not the true Pope of the Roman Church, began to
communicate their fears and misgivings on the subject to others, particularly
to laypeople, verbally and in writing. Why did they address
their speculations to the people, who could not evaluate them? Why
did they not discuss their thoughts with their fellow priests? Because
Traditionalist priests do not get along with each other, and they will
not abide disagreement with themselves. They communicated their
conclusions to those who have learned that it is the better part of valor
not to disagree with these oracles-if, that is, they wished to continue
to receive the Sacraments from them.
What happened? One step followed another in logical sequence.
If John Paul II is not the true Pope, he does not deserve that I should
pronounce his name in the Canon of the Mass. Someone else
reasoned: If John Paul II is not the true Pope, who is? Why, Cardinal
Sin, to be sure. Someone else concluded: Anyone who names Pope
John Paul II in the Canon of Mass is a part of the Conciliar Establishment.
Someone else ruled: It is a sin, a mortal sin, to include the name
of John Paul II in the Canon of the Mass. Someone else warned: I will
not give Communion to anyone who attends the Mass of any priest
who names John Paul II in the Canon of the Mass. Where John Paul II
rules the Church not at all, these petty pontiffs rule it with Calvinesque
arbitrariness...."