Well said. I have said many times in the past how Cekada's novel "Una cuм" construct was a convenient, selfish, self-serving device to "remove the competition" and make more income/money for himself and his chapel(s).
What better way to "own" your parishioners, than by removing all other Masses as an option?
It's diabolically brilliant -- and quite obvious.
He only adopted this stance several years after Bp Sanborn did. When I first got to MHT in 1999, DD and AC were not at all anti-una cuм. They saw each other very often (Fr. C was spending one week a month at MHT teaching) -- yet he failed to see any merit in the position. Oddly, Sanborn's adherence to Cassiciacuм is more consistent with a NON-anti-una cuм stance. Fr. Martin Stepanich was always staunchly against the anti-una cuм position -- and his training and experience were orders of magnitude greater than any at MHT, SGG, etc. Such is Traddieland, such are these times.
Topic: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI (Read 42504 times)