CathInfo.com

Maybe the video should be provided.  I wonder whether this was in reference to making a lump sum donation to help fund the new seminary building.

Mario Derksen attends a CMRI chapel.  I've not seen this promotion of the "non-una cuм novelty of Father Cekada and co." on Novus Ordo Watch.  I think you may be confusing the position of Novus Ordo Watch with the people who post comments.  He is most definitely against the Novus Ordo and believes that the sedevacantist position is the correct position, but, as far as I can tell, his doctrinal positions on this matter pretty much mirror those of Bishop Pivarunas and the CMRI.

The CMRI’s laxity on this issue is only more troubling when compounded by their permissiveness in the creation of annulment tribunals. The SSPX has engaged in this sham for years, but it has been known for some time that some of the CMRI’s priests engage in the judging of marriage cases. But this is something that falls directly under the legal functions of the Church and does not fall under epikeia. No one currently possesses the authority to issue judgments in these marriage cases and so the best our clergy can do is investigate to give someone some sense of probability, but no more than that.
In any case, the fact that even as late as 1968 there were only 338 annulments given for the entire United States that year should give helpful context in this regard.
In our unfortunate situation, there is an easy and effective way for these people to solve their marital dilemmas: abstinence and chastity.  One should not risk a “re-marriage” if one’s “previous” marriage is doubtful or probably invalid.
.