Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI  (Read 42854 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meg

Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #165 on: January 30, 2022, 05:43:49 PM »
My apologies to Jupiter for disrupting the thread, but it hopefully it will be short-lived.

Another thing from the sixties in addition to the rotary phone. This one's for Anne. Granny Clampett gives 'em what for. (Some ideas for how to deal with with us ornery trads):





Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #166 on: January 30, 2022, 05:48:29 PM »
giphy

Never before have I seen someone hate a particular forum so much, but continue to use it daily. :facepalm:
I am puzzled by the lack of decorum of this Anne person. She has done some major derailing on several threads here.

I’ve been familiar with reading forums for a decade or two, but I have never experienced someone constantly interjecting themselves into others conversations just to tell them what they think of their discussions, and what they think of them personally, or as a group.
Who does this?
I would never in a million years walk into a room where people were discussing a topic just to sling around my opinions at everyone. Especially when it is a serious topic like on this particular thread.
Instead, I might ask a few questions, go and study, ask a few more perhaps? Maybe add some knowledge I possess on the topic. 
It just doesn’t make sense to to do it any other way. It wouldn’t matter if it was a group of men, or women, or both talking, shouldn’t all have to respectfully contribute to conversations here on forums, and not butt in just to hear themselves type their words?


Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #167 on: January 31, 2022, 11:23:57 AM »
I do not think that Vatican II is a valid ecuмenical council of the Roman Catholic Church.

That being said, as I mentioned in my response to RomanTheo, the primary issue of our current crisis is not Vatican II. This council can be interpreted in a way, commensurate to the machinations that gave birth to it, that is in continuity with Tradition due to the very ambiguous nature of its docuмents which were engineered to create weaponized nebulosity.

The primary issue, rather, is that the post Vatican II “Popes,” ecclesiastical hierarchy, theologians, monastic orders, and the vast majority of the laity have apostatized completely from the Catholic faith.

You don't think its a problem that several thousand bishops whose primary duty is to teach and spread the faith signed off on a docuмent containing multiple condemned heresies? 

Seems to me that any bishop who signed off on Vatican became excommunicated when they signed off on heresy.  I mean it contains blatant condemned heresies and the job of a bishop is to know and teach the faith, I don't see how they get much wiggle room with the "well i didn't know" defense.

Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #168 on: January 31, 2022, 11:39:55 AM »
You don't think its a problem that several thousand bishops whose primary duty is to teach and spread the faith signed off on a docuмent containing multiple condemned heresies? 

Seems to me that any bishop who signed off on Vatican became excommunicated when they signed off on heresy.  I mean it contains blatant condemned heresies and the job of a bishop is to know and teach the faith, I don't see how they get much wiggle room with the "well i didn't know" defense.

I think most Bishops were fooled because of the ambiguity of the wording in most of the docuмents. Even Archbishop Lefebvre signed.

Re: Heiner/TR attacks CMRI
« Reply #169 on: January 31, 2022, 11:40:28 AM »
See, what "group do you align with?" Exactly what I have been saying. Every new person here has to be slotted into some box or category so the rest of the group can approve or not and therefore bash accordingly.

Btw, since you are on this thread and I am thinking of it, there is irony in the fact that you are trying to judge people by classifying them. But please keep in mind, that I am quite certain there is at least one member here (obviously not me) that would still consider you a Jєω, even if you have converted to the Catholic Faith. In other words, if you were to walk down the street, they would judge you by appearances alone based on your phenotype. No, they don't have your DNA, thanks God, but that would not stop them from possibly doing harm to you.

Just go back and read some of the trash threads here and see the absolute HATRED for Jєωιѕн people. It is not hard to figure out.

So please keep yourself safe down there in the CRAZY White-Nationalist-White-Supremacist USA, and keep your wits about you. There ARE people going around the Internet taking notes about ALL Jєωιѕн persons with the intentions of doing harm, or making their lives miserable.

If you don't want to be judged, stop judging others. You may have converted to the Catholic Faith (which is awesome), but some people are still blind and would see you as a Jєω. They only consider the White Race as superior. Blacks and Jєωs (or any other ethnicity) don't cut it.

Learn self-defense, carry pepper spray or whatever, but just recognize the harsh reality. God bless you, Anne
P.S. And it's okay if you were "done with me" before. I forgive you. Gotta go for now.
You have a tendency to invent problems so you can then denounce them and make yourself out to be a champion: ALL THESE PRIEST BASHERS, SO MUCH GOSSIP HERE (hilarious irony in this one as you yourself were the chief gossiper in that thread), WHITE SUPREMACIST RACISTS, JEW HATERS, SO MUCH JUDGEMENT (she judged)

Ann Quixote tilting at windmills.