Tele, these people never have read Vatican II and its error-laden docuмents so I don't think they can ever be brought out of their error. If only they would see the ideology that the Novus Ordo-bearing establishment has wrought onto the sheep, Christ's sheep.
You mean the majority of Traditional Catholics who don't really seem to understand the issues?
As Bowler said, if they're ignorant, it's for a reason. It's because they're not being taught anymore by the SSPX the nature of the problems.
Yes, the majority of Traditional Catholics and even more so nearly all neo-Traditionalists that fill the rank and file of indult groups, Fellay-SSPX groups, and conservative Novus Ordo. I suppose this leaves a small remnant who do follow the true Church and its teachings.
The recent thread in SSPX-Rome forum here regarding Fr. Ringrose's letter summarizes my sentiments on bringing to the light the erroneous mindset of those who take 95% of Vatican II as good, and remove the 5% of it that is bad. The problem is not with those who reject Vatican II entirely, the problem is with those who think a Church can promulgate error authoritatively (which Vatican II did do , obviously by Paul VI's signature and declaration) and that it is acceptable to take any error in a church-approved council. "Those who abandon the faith by one iota have rejected all of it"... How fitting Fr. Ringrose made that statement during his sermon at St. Athanasius Church because St. Athanasius declared that as well during the homoousion vs homoiousion controversy.