Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?  (Read 1346 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Geremia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4118
  • Reputation: +1257/-258
  • Gender: Male
    • St. Isidore e-book library
Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
« on: January 28, 2014, 08:30:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Wanna see my picture on the cover
    Wanna buy five copies for my mother...
    Wanna see my smilin' face
    On the cover of the Rollin' Stone...
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co/calibre


    Offline Thorn

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1188
    • Reputation: +710/-81
    • Gender: Female
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #1 on: January 28, 2014, 08:33:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Why not?
    Birds of a feather.....
    "I will lead her into solitude and there I will speak to her heart.  Osee 2:14


    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #2 on: January 28, 2014, 08:55:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Anti-pope :detective:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline Petertherock

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 673
    • Reputation: +0/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #3 on: January 28, 2014, 11:24:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I wouldn't have a problem with this if he was trying to bring the readers of this rag to the Faith, but I doubt that is what he is doing.


    Offline ggreg

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3001
    • Reputation: +184/-179
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #4 on: January 29, 2014, 02:05:52 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It seems in this case that,  A Rolling Stone Blathers N.O. Mass


    Offline Man of the West

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 200
    • Reputation: +306/-1
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #5 on: January 29, 2014, 02:54:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Geremia
    Quote
    Wanna see my picture on the cover
    Wanna buy five copies for my mother...
    Wanna see my smilin' face
    On the cover of the Rollin' Stone...


    The smirk of Satan has entered the Catholic Church.
    Confronting modernity from the depths of the human spirit, in communion with Christ the King.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #6 on: January 29, 2014, 03:49:56 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Petertherock

    I wouldn't have a problem with this if he was trying to bring the readers of this rag to the Faith, but I doubt that is what he is doing.



    "...bring readers of this rag to the Faith..."  -- gathering the flock.

    Pope Francis speaks Spanish.  Se habla Español.

    "A rolling stone gathers no moss" = This Rolling Stone gathers nada mas.


    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #7 on: January 29, 2014, 04:36:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • .

    Fr. Pfeiffer's latest sermon touches on this.

    Start listening about minute 20, to see:

    He says in our time, the Pope that will consecrate Russia (according to Our Lady's request) will be a wicked pope, and not a good one.  And it will require tragic events to make him finally repent, and a miraculous intervention from heaven to make him finally repent, and then that wicked pope will turn, and he will consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  He will obey the Blessed Virgin Mary, and THEN, strengthen the brethren.  It must be that he truly is the Holy Father.  

    This is one reason why, when we mentioned the Declaration, the 45 priests ... released last week on January 19th ... there were 45 priests who signed but two that I know of are sedevacantists.  We cannot work with sedevacantists.  We can have coffee with them, they can come to our Masses, no problem, we can be nice to them, but we cannot work with them.  Because there are two different theologies.

    (As a patient under the care of a doctor) you have to take the right medicine, or else the patient dies... Sedevacantism is a medicine of poison.  There are many good souls that fall for it, and we understand, and we do not judge them.  Because this is a time of crisis in the Church, and we know there are going to be souls who say, "How can he be my father, since he's so wicked?"  

    As Fr. Cyprian used to say, "Sedevacantism is not so much a theological problem as it is an emotional problem."  My father would not give me poison;  my father would not beat me;  my father would not be a worthless drunk;  and this and that.  And he's all those things, and therefore, he's not my father.  

    That doesn't change anything!  He's still your father!  He just likes to drink; he just happens to be a serial killer!  -- everybody's got some problem!  

    The bottom line is, that doesn't change the problem -- he's still the father!  

    We respect him as Pope, and if he comes, we kiss his feet.  They don't do that anymore.  

    [Now, instead, the Pope kisses the feet of atheists!]  This is a scandal, but if he wasn't the pope, it wouldn't matter.  It matters because HE IS THE POPE.

    He needs to be converted!  And it really does matter!  

    [If Fr. Pfeiffer had not been expelled yet from the XSPX, this would be the last straw, because Fr. Pfluger says the Pope does not need to be converted.  See his seminary conferences from December 2013.]

    The Indulterers are guilty of indultery, and what is indultery?  It is the sin of sharing wives.  And we don't share wives.  There is only one wife, only one Holy Mother [Church].  There's only one truth, one Church, and we cannot mix the Newmass with the old.  We cannot mix the new false doctrine with the old false doctrine.  

    In this time of the mystery of iniquity, we find wicked priests who are still priests, wicked bishops who are still bishops, and a wicked pope who is still pope.  



    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #8 on: January 29, 2014, 04:43:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Man of the West

    The smirk of Satan has entered the Catholic Church.......




    ....... through some wise crack!  


    .
    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.

    Offline Mama ChaCha

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 389
    • Reputation: +209/-15
    • Gender: Female
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #9 on: January 29, 2014, 12:27:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I must be a pop culture hermit. I had no idea rolling stone was even still around. I thought it must have gone out of business around 1999. Who still reads rolling stone anyway??
    Matthew 6:34
    " Be not therefore solicitous for to morrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof."

    Offline crossbro

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1434
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #10 on: January 29, 2014, 12:45:05 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Sex drugs and rock and roll...

    the cover is a good place for him


    Offline Capt McQuigg

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 4671
    • Reputation: +2624/-10
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #11 on: January 29, 2014, 12:59:46 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: ggreg
    It seems in this case that,  A Rolling Stone Blathers N.O. Mass


    Maybe Pope Francis will hold a mass with the Rolling Stones instead of that choir in the Vatican....

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #12 on: January 29, 2014, 01:59:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Anti-pope :heretic:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

    Offline McFiggly

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 457
    • Reputation: +4/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #13 on: January 29, 2014, 02:00:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Neil Obstat
    .

    Fr. Pfeiffer's latest sermon touches on this.

    Start listening about minute 20, to see:

    He says in our time, the Pope that will consecrate Russia (according to Our Lady's request) will be a wicked pope, and not a good one.  And it will require tragic events to make him finally repent, and a miraculous intervention from heaven to make him finally repent, and then that wicked pope will turn, and he will consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary.  He will obey the Blessed Virgin Mary, and THEN, strengthen the brethren.  It must be that he truly is the Holy Father.  

    This is one reason why, when we mentioned the Declaration, the 45 priests ... released last week on January 19th ... there were 45 priests who signed but two that I know of are sedevacantists.  We cannot work with sedevacantists.  We can have coffee with them, they can come to our Masses, no problem, we can be nice to them, but we cannot work with them.  Because there are two different theologies.

    (As a patient under the care of a doctor) you have to take the right medicine, or else the patient dies... Sedevacantism is a medicine of poison.  There are many good souls that fall for it, and we understand, and we do not judge them.  Because this is a time of crisis in the Church, and we know there are going to be souls who say, "How can he be my father, since he's so wicked?"  

    As Fr. Cyprian used to say, "Sedevacantism is not so much a theological problem as it is an emotional problem."  My father would not give me poison;  my father would not beat me;  my father would not be a worthless drunk;  and this and that.  And he's all those things, and therefore, he's not my father.  

    That doesn't change anything!  He's still your father!  He just likes to drink; he just happens to be a serial killer!  -- everybody's got some problem!  

    The bottom line is, that doesn't change the problem -- he's still the father!  

    We respect him as Pope, and if he comes, we kiss his feet.  They don't do that anymore.  

    [Now, instead, the Pope kisses the feet of atheists!]  This is a scandal, but if he wasn't the pope, it wouldn't matter.  It matters because HE IS THE POPE.

    He needs to be converted!  And it really does matter!  

    [If Fr. Pfeiffer had not been expelled yet from the XSPX, this would be the last straw, because Fr. Pfluger says the Pope does not need to be converted.  See his seminary conferences from December 2013.]

    The Indulterers are guilty of indultery, and what is indultery?  It is the sin of sharing wives.  And we don't share wives.  There is only one wife, only one Holy Mother [Church].  There's only one truth, one Church, and we cannot mix the Newmass with the old.  We cannot mix the new false doctrine with the old false doctrine.  

    In this time of the mystery of iniquity, we find wicked priests who are still priests, wicked bishops who are still bishops, and a wicked pope who is still pope.  





    What would the Pope have to do before Fr. Pfeiffer conceded that he was no longer Pope? Weren't Arius and his crew recognized by St. Athanasius and his crew as apostates? All Arius did was deny the Divinity of Christ, bless him; that's practically a blushing maiden level of innocence compared to the modernist Popes that we have today, who deny just about every Catholic dogma, including the Divinity of Christ, but in a very sneaky, obscurantist way.

    Offline roscoe

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7610
    • Reputation: +617/-404
    • Gender: Male
    Guess whos on the cover of Rolling Stone?
    « Reply #14 on: January 29, 2014, 03:41:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There is about as much chance that a true Pope could be wicked as there is that S rev around E----ZERO :roll-laugh2: :detective:
    There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
    nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'