Catholic Info

Traditional Catholic Faith => Crisis in the Church => Topic started by: ranlare on September 09, 2017, 08:23:28 AM

Title: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: ranlare on September 09, 2017, 08:23:28 AM
The Marks of Cain

What enity is responsible for the "artwork" on the sede ecuмenist Michael Cain's DailyCatholic website? Has anyone ever taken "credit"... turned themselves in?

gro·tesque
ɡrōˈtesk/
adjective

Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: TKGS on September 09, 2017, 08:31:33 AM
I haven't scoured the entire website, but do you have an example of the artwork you don't like?
Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: ranlare on September 09, 2017, 09:25:35 AM
Quote from: TKGS on September 09, 2017, 08:31:33 AM
I haven't scoured the entire website, but do you have an example of the artwork you don't like?

First, excuse my typo. I meant to say, "What entity is responsible for the "artwork"...

Sometimes I check on what the enemy is doing. I had not gone to that site in a few years. It has frequently been covered by bizarre bulbous "cartoonish type" illustrations and odd-ball fat fonts, often proclaiming "bible verses", in eyesore hues. Michael Cain, a schismatic [heretic], has obviously zero sensus catholicus.
Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: ranlare on September 09, 2017, 09:55:41 AM
Maybe Griff Ruby, a long-time contributer to that mudheap, moonlights in the graphics department?
Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: TKGS on September 09, 2017, 10:55:50 AM
Quote from: ranlare on September 09, 2017, 09:25:35 AM
First, excuse my typo. I meant to say, "What entity is responsible for the "artwork"...

Sometimes I check on what the enemy is doing. I had not gone to that site in a few years. It has frequently been covered by bizarre bulbous "cartoonish type" illustrations and odd-ball fat fonts, often proclaiming "bible verses", in eyesore hues. Michael Cain, a schismatic [heretic], has obviously zero sensus catholicus.
If you consider "Daily Catholic" the enemy, you are one evil man.  
Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: Marlelar on September 09, 2017, 08:07:50 PM
"Grotesque", is a gross overstatement.  

Outdated, yes, it reminds me of the graphics done in the early days of the internet . A bit stuck in the past perhaps, but he's a senior citizen, lost his beloved wife a few years ago after something like 50 yrs of marriage and is just trying to carry on.

Why so judgemental?
Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: Nadir on September 09, 2017, 10:01:11 PM
Don't go there if it offends you. And don't come round to my house...
Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: ranlare on September 10, 2017, 01:09:32 AM
Quote from: TKGS on September 09, 2017, 08:31:33 AM
I haven't scoured the entire website, but do you have an example of the artwork you don't like?

I wouldn't consider posting examples of the repulsive imagery often seen on that gross site. In countless cases we're clearly talking about offenses against the sacred... and that is not even touching on the poisonous prose, oozing from that rag.




Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: ranlare on September 10, 2017, 01:12:33 AM
Quote from: Nadir on September 09, 2017, 10:01:11 PM
And don't come round to my house...

Did you know for the first time in history, more young adults today are living at home with mom and dad than with a spouse... ?
Title: Re: Gross Illustrations on Sede Michael Cain's Ecuмenical Website
Post by: DZ PLEASE on September 10, 2017, 02:19:49 PM
Quote from: tornpage on September 10, 2017, 01:51:39 PM
Maybe (likely) I'm outdated: I like the graphics, particularly the bright colors, of DC.

Content wise. Nope. Not at all, but unless there is something actually morally wrong there now, then I kinda liked the garish/"cheery" thing myself.

Maybe it's because most everything else is so danged stark and depressing, but whatever.